Ansell TouchNTuff 93-800 Chemical-Resistant Nitrile Gloves Review (2025): EN 374 Protection for Hazardous Chemical Handling
Affiliate disclosure: WC Safety earns a commission on qualifying Amazon purchases at no extra cost to you. Full disclosure.
Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety Editorial — 2025
| Thickness | 8.3 mil |
|---|---|
| Color | Aqua/Teal |
| Count | 50 gloves/box |
| Cuff Length | 12 inches extended |
| Material | Nitrile |
| Powder | Powder-free |
| Latex | Latex-free |
| Standard | EN 374-1/-2/-3, EN 420 |
The Ansell TouchNTuff 93-800 is a purpose-rated EN 374 chemical-resistant nitrile glove designed for lab chemists, hazmat technicians, and industrial workers who handle organic solvents, acids, and chemical mixtures—where standard industrial nitrile offers insufficient permeation resistance.
Why This Glove Stands Out
Published · Last updated
EN 374 chemical permeation testing is the key differentiator. Unlike standard nitrile gloves, the 93-800 has been tested for breakthrough time against a panel of chemical agents and carries a Type designation validating its permeation resistance. The 12-inch extended cuff adds wrist protection against splash from above—a critical gap in standard 9.5-inch disposable gloves.
It helps to understand what that EN 374 mark actually buys you. A glove with no chemical rating is built to one job: keep your bare skin from touching liquid. The moment a solvent contacts the surface, molecules begin diffusing through the polymer film whether or not the glove looks intact. EN 374 quantifies how long that takes. The standard assigns a permeation performance level from 1 to 6 based on the breakthrough time measured for a given challenge chemical—Level 1 is at least 10 minutes, Level 6 is more than 480 minutes. A Type designation (A, B, or C) then summarizes how many of the standard's listed chemicals the glove held to at least the 30-minute threshold. The 93-800 was engineered specifically to clear that bar against the solvents and acids labs see most, which is precisely why it earns a place in chemical work that a generic blue exam glove cannot.
Performance and Fit
At 8.3 mil, this glove provides substantial physical durability alongside its chemical barrier. The thickness protects against puncture and abrasion during chemical handling tasks, while the nitrile formulation resists permeation from organic solvents, acids, bases, and many other laboratory and industrial chemicals. For tasks where you cannot switch gloves frequently, this barrier performance matters.
The aqua color is standard for Ansell TouchNTuff chemical-resistant products—providing visual identification that the correct chemical-rated glove is in use. In laboratory and chemical plant environments where multiple glove types are stored together, aqua immediately signals chemical protection class versus blue exam or black industrial gloves.
Fit is where a chemical glove either helps or hurts you. An 8.3 mil film is meaningfully thicker than the 3 to 5 mil exam gloves most technicians are used to, so the first impression is a stiffer, more substantial glove. Ansell's hand former and textured fingertips keep tactile feedback respectable for the gauge—you can still operate pipette plungers, turn valve handles, and manipulate small fittings—but you will notice the trade against a thin exam glove on truly fine work. Because permeation resistance depends on an intact, well-fitted barrier, size selection is not cosmetic: a glove that is too large bunches at the fingertips and snags, while one that is too small stretches the film thin and shortens breakthrough time. Order a sample box and confirm sizing on the people who will wear them before committing to a bulk order.
Durability and Chemical Protection
The 12-inch extended cuff addresses a real hazard gap. When working with open containers or overhead pour situations, standard 9.5-inch cuffs leave the wrist exposed. The 93-800's extended cuff protects the forearm against chemical contact and can be tucked under a lab coat or sleeve. Note: for heavy prolonged chemical immersion, reusable chemical-resistant gloves (neoprene, butyl) may be more appropriate—the 93-800 is a high-performance disposable, not a reusable chemical gauntlet.
Treat the published breakthrough time as a ceiling for a fresh, undamaged glove against a single chemical at room temperature—not a guarantee in the field. Three things shorten it in practice. Temperature: warmer chemicals permeate faster, so a solvent that gives you 30 minutes on the bench may give far less from a heated bath. Mixtures: real processes rarely involve one pure chemical, and a blend can attack the polymer differently than any single component. Mechanical stress: stretching the film over knuckles or abrading it on a rough surface thins the barrier exactly where you need it most. The disciplined approach is to set a maximum wear time below the rated breakthrough for your worst-case chemical, change gloves on that schedule regardless of how they look, and treat any visible swelling, softening, or color change as immediate grounds for replacement.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- EN 374 chemical permeation testing validates resistance against documented chemical agents
- 12-inch extended cuff protects wrist and lower forearm against chemical splash
- 8.3 mil provides strong puncture and abrasion resistance alongside chemical barrier
- Aqua color provides clear visual identification of chemical-rated gloves in multi-glove environments
Cons
- 50-per-box count means higher per-pair cost than standard industrial nitrile
- 8.3 mil reduces dexterity—not appropriate for fine-motor or tactile-sensitive tasks
Who Should Buy This Glove
Order for laboratory chemists, quality control technicians, hazmat response teams, and chemical manufacturing workers who need validated EN 374 chemical permeation resistance in a disposable format. The extended cuff is specifically valuable for overhead pour and decanting tasks.
This glove is also a strong fit for facilities that run a mixed chemical workflow—a technician who decants solvents in the morning, handles dilute acids midday, and cleans equipment in the afternoon does not want to keep swapping between three single-purpose gloves. A broadly rated EN 374 disposable like the 93-800 lets one glove cover the whole task list, and the disposable format means contamination is thrown away rather than carried between steps. For spill-response kits, where you cannot know in advance which chemical you will meet, a Type-rated multi-chemical disposable is exactly the right thing to stock.
Who Should Skip It
Skip if your tasks are primarily mechanical (grip, puncture, abrasion) rather than chemical—the Ansell 93-256 MEGA Texture better serves automotive and heavy assembly. Skip for general exam use—the 93-800 at 8.3 mil is overspec for routine healthcare.
You should also skip it for sustained immersion. If the job involves dunking your hands into a chemical bath for long stretches—parts washing in a solvent tank, extended decontamination work—a thin disposable is the wrong tool no matter how good its rating, and a reusable neoprene or butyl gauntlet is the correct upgrade. And if your only real need is a specific regulatory citation, such as USP 800 hazardous-drug handling, choose the glove that carries that exact rating rather than relying on general EN 374 chemical resistance.
How It Compares
The Ansell 93-256 MEGA Texture is the mechanical equivalent—built for grip and abrasion rather than chemical permeation. The Kimtech Purple addresses a specific chemical subset (USP 800 hazardous drugs) at lower gauge. For sustained heavy chemical exposure beyond disposable glove capability, upgrade to reusable neoprene or butyl chemical gauntlets.
It is worth placing the 93-800 against the other EN 374 disposables in the catalog so the decision is clear. The Kimtech Polaris also carries EN 374 marking and works well for lab and food-production splash protection, but at a lighter gauge and standard cuff length—it is the choice when dexterity outranks barrier depth. The Microflex Supreno SE targets a different problem entirely: accelerator-free chemistry for workers with Type IV nitrile dermatitis, not maximum chemical breakthrough time. Against all of these, the 93-800's edge is its combination of thicker 8.3 mil film and the 12-inch cuff, which is the right pairing when splash from above and longer breakthrough time both matter. Buy on the dominant requirement of your task: chemical depth and forearm coverage point to the 93-800; tactile precision points to the lighter Polaris.
Total Cost of Ownership
At 50 gloves per box, the 93-800 has a higher per-pair cost than a 100-count general industrial nitrile, and that gap is real—but it is the wrong number to optimize in isolation. The relevant cost is cost per safely completed task. A cheap glove that breaks through halfway through the job is not cheap; it is a contamination event, a re-glove, and potentially a skin exposure. Budgeting the 93-800 specifically for the chemical-contact portion of the workflow—rather than handing it out for every task—keeps spend proportionate to risk. Many sites pair this glove with a standard inexpensive nitrile for dry, non-chemical handling and reserve the 93-800 for the moments where permeation resistance actually earns its premium. That two-tier approach controls cost without compromising protection where it counts.
Related Nitrile Gloves
- Ansell Microflex 93-256 MEGA Texture Orange (industrial grip)
- Ansell Microflex SU-690 Violet Nitrile
- Kimtech Purple Nitrile USP 800 Chemo Gloves
- Kimtech Polaris EN 374 Nitrile Exam Gloves
- Microflex Supreno SE Accelerator-Free Nitrile
- GLOVEWORKS HD Black Nitrile (8 mil mechanical)
- Venom Steel 8 Mil Orange Nitrile (heavy industrial)
- SHOWA 6110PF EBT Biodegradable Nitrile Gloves
Safety Guides
- Disposable Respirators Complete Guide
- 3M Respiratory Protection: Complete Buyer's Guide
- Best Hearing Protection Guide
- Respirator Sizing Guide
- How to Fit-Test a Respirator
- Can You Wear a Respirator with a Beard?
Browse by Category
- Nitrile Gloves Collection
- Safety Glasses Collection
- Foam Ear Plugs Collection
- Welding Goggles Collection
- Product Reviews Hub
- Safety Guides Hub
Frequently Asked Questions
What chemicals does the TouchNTuff 93-800 resist?
The 93-800 is tested against a panel of chemical agents per EN 374. It demonstrates resistance to many organic solvents, acids, bases, and industrial chemicals. Consult Ansell's chemical resistance guide for specific chemicals and breakthrough times before use.
What is EN 374 certification?
EN 374 is a European standard for protective gloves against chemicals and microorganisms. It tests for penetration resistance, permeation breakthrough time, and degradation. A glove rated to EN 374 has been validated against specific chemical challenge agents.
What is chemical permeation time?
Permeation is the process by which a chemical passes through the glove material at the molecular level without visible damage. Breakthrough time measures how long it takes for a chemical to permeate through the glove at a detectable level—longer is safer.
How long is the cuff on the 93-800?
12 inches from fingertip to cuff. Standard disposable nitrile gloves typically measure 9 to 9.5 inches—the extended cuff adds approximately 2.5 inches of additional wrist and forearm coverage.
Can the 93-800 be used for hazardous drug handling (USP 800)?
The 93-800 is EN 374 chemical-resistant nitrile. For USP 800 compliance with NIOSH-listed hazardous drugs specifically, the Kimtech Purple (5.9 mil, USP 800 rated) is the product with that specific regulatory citation.
Is the 93-800 sterile?
No—non-sterile industrial/laboratory gloves. Sterile chemical-resistant gloves require separate certification and packaging.
What is the difference between chemical permeation and penetration?
Penetration is bulk flow of a chemical through pinholes or tears—prevented by any intact glove. Permeation is molecular diffusion through intact glove material—only chemically-rated gloves provide permeation resistance beyond that of standard nitrile.
Can I use these for acid handling?
Yes, with limitations. Check Ansell's chemical resistance data for the specific acid and concentration. Strong concentrated acids at high temperature may permeate more quickly. The EN 374 test data provides the breakthrough times you need.
How often should I change chemical-resistant gloves?
Replace upon any visible damage, chemical contamination breakthrough, or after the tested breakthrough time for the specific chemical in use. For high-hazard chemicals, establish a maximum wear time based on the EN 374 breakthrough data.
Are these gloves reusable?
These are classified as disposable single-use gloves. Some users extend use across a single task session, but they are not designed for washing, disinfecting, and reuse like industrial chemical gauntlets.
What is the aqua color code for?
Ansell uses aqua consistently across its TouchNTuff chemical-resistant line for visual identification. In lab and chemical plant environments, aqua immediately signals chemical-rated protection class.
What sizes are available?
S through XL (some product configurations). The extended cuff helps with fit—verify sizing before bulk ordering.
How does the 93-800 compare to neoprene or butyl gauntlets?
Reusable neoprene and butyl gauntlets provide heavier gauge and longer-duration chemical resistance for sustained immersion tasks. The 93-800 is appropriate for shorter-duration tasks, multi-task chemical work, or when disposable format is required for contamination control.
Is the glove tested for bloodborne pathogen protection?
EN 374-2 tests for virus penetration resistance. Consult the specific product documentation—many chemical-resistant gloves also provide bloodborne pathogen barrier protection.
Does the extended cuff affect donning?
Slightly—the longer cuff requires careful donning to ensure a secure fit and no gaps at the wrist. Some users gown over the cuff; others fold the cuff back. The extra length is operationally valuable for splash protection.
What do the EN 374 Type A, B, and C designations mean?
Under the current EN 374-1 framework, Type A gloves achieve at least 30 minutes of breakthrough time against six listed chemicals, Type B against three, and Type C against one. The letter tells you how many challenge chemicals the glove held back at the 30-minute permeation threshold—always confirm the glove resisted the specific chemical you handle, not just the count.
Should I double-glove with the 93-800?
Double-gloving is a common practice for higher-hazard chemical and hazardous-drug work. A thinner under-glove plus the 8.3 mil 93-800 as the outer layer extends the effective barrier and lets you change the contaminated outer glove without bare-hand exposure. Follow your site's standard operating procedure for the specific hazard.
Does the 93-800 work for cold-weather or freezer chemical work?
Nitrile stays flexible across a wide temperature range, so the 93-800 remains usable in cool environments, but disposable gloves are thin and provide no thermal insulation. For cryogenic or sustained cold work, layer an insulated glove underneath or use a dedicated cold-rated chemical glove.
The Bottom Line
The TouchNTuff 93-800 is the correct choice when you need documented EN 374 chemical resistance in a disposable format with extended wrist coverage. The combination of 8.3 mil gauge, permeation testing, and 12-inch cuff addresses chemical exposure scenarios that standard disposable nitrile cannot safely cover.
About the Author
Steven Eaton is the founder of WC Safety and a hands-on industrial PPE specialist with over a decade of experience sourcing and evaluating disposable gloves, respirators, and hearing protection for industrial, medical, and food-service environments.
Testing Methodology
Reviews are based on manufacturer specification sheets, ASTM/EN certification documentation, published comparative testing, and direct product handling. Ratings reflect build quality, specification value, and suitability for the intended application.
Affiliate Disclosure
WC Safety is an Amazon Associate. We earn commissions on qualifying purchases through Amazon links on this page at no additional cost to you. Affiliate relationships do not influence editorial ratings or recommendations. Full disclosure policy.
Editorial Standards
All product claims are drawn directly from published technical data sheets, ASTM/EN certification records, or manufacturer documentation. WC Safety does not fabricate specifications, certifications, or comparative claims. Errors may be reported to safetynw2012@gmail.com.
Leave a comment