Skip to content
Industrial Safety Equipment & PPE — ANSI/OSHA Compliant
Industrial Safety Equipment & PPE — ANSI/OSHA Compliant
Ansell Microflex Diamond Grip Natural Rubber Latex Gloves — MF-300 product photo

Ansell Microflex MF-300 Diamond Grip Gloves Review (2025): Premium Latex Option for Wet-Surface Grip

★★★★½ 4.4/5

Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety Editorial — 2025

Microflex MF-300 Diamond Grip Latex — Key Specifications
Material Natural Rubber Latex (NOT nitrile)
Thickness ~4.7 mil
Color Natural/Tan
Count 100 gloves/box
Powder Powder-free
Standard ASTM D3578
Latex Contains latex — NOT latex-free

The Ansell Microflex MF-300 is a premium powder-free latex examination glove—not nitrile—distinguished by its all-over diamond texture that significantly outperforms flat-surface latex on wet instrument handling. If latex sensitization is not a concern, this glove delivers superior tactile feedback and elasticity that nitrile cannot fully replicate.

Why This Glove Stands Out

Published · Last updated

Latex's natural elasticity gives the MF-300 a conforming fit that wraps hand anatomy more closely than nitrile at an equivalent gauge. Combined with the full-hand diamond texture, it maintains grip on wet glassware, instruments, and food-contact surfaces better than many nitrile competitors at the same mil thickness.

Performance and Fit

The diamond pattern raises above the glove surface across the palm and fingers, not just at the fingertips. In wet handling environments—food processing, dentistry, veterinary work—the texture channels liquid away from the grip zone. During comparative testing on wet surgical instruments, the MF-300 held contact significantly better than flat-surface latex at identical gauge.

Natural rubber latex provides a tactile sensitivity advantage over nitrile that remains meaningful for fine-motor tasks: suturing, dental procedures, precision electronics. The MF-300's gauge is calibrated to balance this sensitivity with durability—4.7 mil is heavier than thin exam gloves without compromising dexterity. Powder-free formulation eliminates talc contamination concerns.

The reason latex still earns a place despite the allergy tradeoff is mechanical: natural rubber has higher elongation and elastic recovery than nitrile, so the glove stretches further before tearing and snaps back to the hand rather than ballooning. That elasticity is what delivers the "second-skin" tactile feel practitioners describe during fine-motor work, and it is governed by ASTM D3578, the standard for rubber examination gloves that sets minimum tensile strength, elongation, dimensions, and acceptable quality limits for pinholes. On the MF-300 the all-over diamond texture builds on that base: the raised pattern displaces liquid at the contact point, so wet glassware and instruments stay in hand instead of sliding. At roughly 4.7 mil the gauge is deliberately heavier than a thin economy exam glove, which buys durability across a procedure without dulling the sensitivity that makes latex worth choosing in the first place.

Durability and Chemical Protection

Critical limitation: this glove contains natural rubber latex and poses Type I immediate hypersensitivity risk to latex-allergic individuals. It also contains rubber accelerators that may trigger Type IV contact dermatitis in accelerator-sensitive users. If anyone in your supply chain—workers, patients, or end users—has latex sensitivity, choose the Ansell Microflex SU-690 (accelerator-reduced nitrile) or the Microflex Supreno SE (fully accelerator-free nitrile) instead.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Full-hand diamond texture provides superior wet-surface grip versus flat or fingertip-only textured gloves
  • Natural rubber latex elasticity delivers conforming fit and tactile sensitivity that nitrile cannot match
  • Powder-free eliminates talc contamination on instruments, food-contact surfaces, and electronics
  • ASTM D3578 compliance ensures minimum quality standards for examination gloves

Cons

  • Contains natural rubber latex—CANNOT be used by or with latex-allergic individuals
  • Natural rubber contains rubber accelerators that may trigger Type IV contact dermatitis in sensitized users

Who Should Buy This Glove

Order this glove for applications where latex is permissible and preferred: dental procedures, veterinary work, food processing, wet-handling lab work. Users who prefer the natural fit and tactile feel of latex and have verified no latex sensitivity in their team.

Who Should Skip It

Do not order if any worker, patient, or contact has latex allergy or sensitivity. Do not use in facilities with latex-free policies. For latex-free alternatives with comparable texture, see the Ansell Microflex SU-690 (violet nitrile) or the Microflex Supreno SE.

How It Compares

For a nitrile alternative with similar texture, the Ansell Microflex SU-690 Violet delivers reduced-accelerator nitrile with exam-grade AQL. For fully accelerator-free nitrile, the Microflex Supreno SE is the closest analog without latex risk. Neither nitrile option fully replicates latex elasticity, but both are safe for latex-sensitive environments.

When you map the MF-300 against its nitrile stablemates, the choice is really safety policy first and feel second. If your facility allows latex and no one in the contact chain is sensitized, the MF-300 keeps the elasticity advantage. The moment latex is off the table, the Ansell Microflex SU-690 is the closest textured nitrile analog with reduced accelerators, and the Microflex Supreno SE goes further by removing chemical accelerators entirely for users prone to Type IV contact dermatitis. For chemical-splash duty the TouchNTuff 93-800 is the better barrier. None of the nitrile options fully reproduce latex stretch, but each removes the Type I hypersensitivity risk - the deciding factor any time patients, customers, or coworkers may be exposed. Browse the alternatives in the nitrile gloves collection.

Safety Guides

Browse by Category

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Ansell MF-300 nitrile or latex?

Latex. The Microflex MF-300 is a natural rubber latex examination glove, not nitrile. If you require a latex-free glove, see the Ansell Microflex SU-690 (violet nitrile) or Microflex Supreno SE (accelerator-free nitrile).

Can someone with a latex allergy use the MF-300?

No. This glove contains natural rubber latex and poses Type I hypersensitivity risk. Anyone with a latex allergy must not use this glove or be in proximity to others wearing it. Choose a 100% nitrile option.

What makes the diamond grip pattern different?

The diamond texture covers the full palm and fingers, not just fingertips. This increases surface contact area on wet instruments and provides better grip than standard single-texture or flat-surface latex gloves.

What is ASTM D3578?

ASTM D3578 covers rubber examination gloves for medical application—specifying minimum thickness, physical dimensions, AQL defect rates, and performance requirements for natural rubber latex exam gloves.

Is the MF-300 powder-free?

Yes. Powder-free—no talc contamination on instruments, food-contact surfaces, or sensitive areas.

Can I use these for food handling?

Yes, if no latex allergy is present in your team or customer base. The powder-free formulation is appropriate for food contact. Verify compliance with local food service regulations.

What is Type I latex hypersensitivity?

Type I is an immediate IgE-mediated immune response to natural rubber latex proteins. Symptoms range from hives and itching to anaphylaxis. This is distinct from Type IV contact dermatitis caused by rubber accelerators.

What is Type IV contact dermatitis from gloves?

Type IV is a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to chemical accelerators used in glove manufacturing (thiurams, carbamates, mercaptobenzothiazoles). Symptoms appear 12–48 hours after contact. Both latex and nitrile gloves may contain accelerators—for accelerator-free options, see the Microflex Supreno SE.

How does latex compare to nitrile in chemical resistance?

Latex resists aqueous solutions and mild cleaning chemicals but is poor against petroleum-based solvents and many organic chemicals. Nitrile generally outperforms latex on chemical resistance for oils, fuels, and many solvents.

What is the shelf life?

Three to five years when stored away from UV light, ozone, and heat. Natural rubber degrades faster than nitrile under poor storage conditions.

Are these gloves sterile?

No—these are non-sterile examination gloves. For sterile procedures, surgical-grade sterile latex gloves with individual packaging are required.

What sizes are available?

XS through XL. Latex conforms more naturally to hand shape than nitrile—sizing is typically the same as your usual examination glove size.

Can I use these for tattooing?

If your clients and state regulations permit latex, yes. Many tattoo artists prefer latex for its tactile sensitivity. If any client has latex allergy, switch to nitrile.

Is the MF-300 good for dental procedures?

Yes—dental professionals who prefer latex and work in latex-permissible environments frequently choose full-texture latex for its tactile properties during procedures. Verify patient latex status before use.

What nitrile alternatives does Ansell make?

Ansell offers the Microflex SU-690 (violet, reduced-accelerator nitrile, 3.9 mil), the Microflex 93-256 (orange, 9.5 mil, MEGA Texture for industrial), and the TouchNTuff 93-800 (aqua, 8.3 mil, chemical-resistant) as nitrile alternatives.

The Bottom Line

The MF-300 is one of the better powder-free latex examination gloves available when latex is permissible. The full-hand diamond texture is a genuine grip improvement over flat latex. However, its use is appropriately limited to latex-safe environments—for everyone else, a nitrile alternative is the correct choice.

A note on storage and disposal that applies to any natural-rubber glove: latex degrades faster than nitrile under poor conditions, so keep boxes cool, dry, and away from UV light and ozone, and observe the three-to-five-year shelf window with first-in, first-out rotation. These are non-sterile examination gloves, so they are not a substitute for individually packaged sterile surgical gloves where a sterile field is required. For the wider material and chemical-compatibility picture, our nitrile gloves complete buyer's guide and the what are nitrile gloves explainer explain when to step away from latex entirely.


About the Author

Steven Eaton is the founder of WC Safety and a hands-on industrial PPE specialist with over a decade of experience sourcing and evaluating disposable gloves, respirators, and hearing protection for industrial, medical, and food-service environments.

Testing Methodology

Reviews are based on manufacturer specification sheets, ASTM/EN certification documentation, published comparative testing, and direct product handling. Ratings reflect build quality, specification value, and suitability for the intended application.

Affiliate Disclosure

WC Safety is an Amazon Associate. We earn commissions on qualifying purchases through Amazon links on this page at no additional cost to you. Affiliate relationships do not influence editorial ratings or recommendations. Full disclosure policy.

Editorial Standards

All product claims are drawn directly from published technical data sheets, ASTM/EN certification records, or manufacturer documentation. WC Safety does not fabricate specifications, certifications, or comparative claims. Errors may be reported to safetynw2012@gmail.com.

Previous article San Jamar Classic Twin 9" Jumbo Tissue Dispenser Review

Leave a comment

* Required fields