Skip to content
Industrial Safety Equipment, PPE Guides & Reviews
Industrial Safety Equipment, PPE Guides & Reviews
Honeywell North RU6500 full face respirator product photo

Honeywell North 6500 Series Full Face Respirator 65002S 65002M 65002L Review

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, WC Safety earns from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Commissions do not influence our review.

★★★★½ 4.5/5

Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety Editorial

Honeywell North RU6500 Series Full Face Respirator (65002S, 65002M, 65002L) — Key Details
Brand Honeywell North
Category Full Face Respirator
Model / SKU RU65002S

The Honeywell North RU6500 Series Full Face Respirator (65002S, 65002M, 65002L) is a full face respirator from Honeywell North, listed on Amazon. This review restates what the product page documents, places it in its respiratory protection lane, and points to the ranked guides for the head-to-head field.

What the Product Page Documents

Published · Last updated

NIOSH Approved (TC-14C) · APF 50 · Silicone Facepiece · Polycarbonate Lens · 5-Point Head Strap · North Bayonet Cartridges · Sizes S / M / L

The Honeywell North RU6500 Series is a premium silicone full-face respirator built for all-day industrial wear and a wide, distortion-free field of view. A one-piece polycarbonate lens maximizes peripheral and downward vision, the soft silicone facepiece and nose cup seal comfortably across long shifts, and the 5-point head strap distributes tension evenly for a stable, repeatable fit. As a full-face respirator it provides eye and face protection together with respiratory protection — an Assigned Protection Factor of 50 , five times the protection of a half-mask.

Available in three sizes — 65002S (Small) , 65002M (Medium) , and 65002L (Large) . Select your size above. Size is confirmed by a mandatory OSHA fit test (29 CFR 1910.134(f)), not by appearance — medium fits the majority of adult workers, with small and large covering narrower and larger facial profiles.

Where It Earns Its Slot

Where it earns its slot: NIOSH Approved (TC-14C) · APF 50 · Silicone Facepiece · Polycarbonate Lens · 5-Point Head Strap · North Bayonet Cartridges · Sizes S / M / L. The rest of this review holds the listing to exactly that brief — limits, alternatives, and the ranked guides included.

Honest Limits

The boundaries matter more here than in most PPE: a tight-fitting respirator protects only after a fit test and a user seal check, cartridges and filters expire on schedules rather than on smell, and nothing in this class is for IDLH atmospheres or oxygen deficiency.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Documented full face respirator from Honeywell North
  • Model RU65002S — traceable part number
  • Listing-grounded specs — nothing invented here

Cons

  • Configuration options live on the linked listing
  • Where the listing is silent on a rating, verify the physical markings

Alternatives in the Same Lane

Respiratory Protection Guides

Browse by Category

Frequently Asked Questions

General questions about ratings, OSHA limits and fit are answered in the When Do You Need a Respirator? guide.

How much does the Honeywell North RU6500 Series Full Face Respirator (65002S, cost?

current pricing at the linked listing — prices track the live page, and configuration choices there can shift the number.

The Bottom Line

Rated 4.5/5 on documented spec, configuration, and value. The Honeywell North RU6500 Series Full Face Respirator (65002S, 65002M, 65 does the job its listing describes — the guides above tell you whether it's the right pick against the field.


About the Author

Steven Eaton is the founder of WC Safety and an industrial PPE specialist who sources and evaluates respiratory protection equipment for industrial and construction buyers.

How We Review

Respiratory reviews restate NIOSH approvals, filter classes, and compatibility exactly as listed — cartridge pairings follow the manufacturer's attachment rules (retainers where required, direct-attach where designed), and every tight-fitting respirator assumes the annual fit test our kits collection now sells. Ratings reflect documented spec, configuration, and value — the basis is stated, not invented testing.

Affiliate Disclosure

WC Safety is an Amazon Associate and earns commissions on qualifying purchases through links on this page. Affiliate relationships do not influence our ratings.

Editorial Standards

Claims are drawn from listing data and published standards. WC Safety does not invent specifications or test results. Report errors to safetynw2012@gmail.com.

Common questions

What does the Honeywell North RU6500 Series Full Face Respirator (65002S, listing actually document?

NIOSH Approved (TC-14C) · APF 50 · Silicone Facepiece · Polycarbonate Lens · 5-Point Head Strap · North Bayonet Cartridges · Sizes S / M / L…

What are the alternatives to the Honeywell North RU6500 Series Full Face Respirator (65002S, ?

The sibling full face respirator options linked in this review, ranked head-to-head in the respiratory protection guides below — start with the buyer's guides for the field view.

Sources. Requirements referenced here come from OSHA 29 CFR 1910 and the NIOSH recommendations. Where a consensus standard governs, the ANSI document is named in the text.

Related reference

Neighbouring references on this site: 3m 6500 series half mask respirator 6501ql 6502ql 6503ql, 3m versaflo tr-6710n-5 high efficiency papr filter (5-pack) review, 3m versaflo tr-6710n high efficiency papr filter review — honest, honeywell north 5400 vs 7600: elastomeric vs silicone full-face, honeywell north 7600 vs 3m 7800s: silicone full-face respirator, and 3m vs honeywell north respirator cartridges.

Why trust WC Safety

WC Safety is an independent, affiliate-supported review site. It is not a retailer: it holds no inventory, takes no orders, and earns only from qualifying purchases through clearly marked links — which never changes what a product is rated to do. Standards language is taken from the regulation text directly, and ratings are reported as the manufacturer publishes them. We run no laboratory and perform no testing of our own. Where published sources disagree, we say so and plan on the conservative figure rather than the flattering one.

Our methodology

Figures come from the regulation and the published specification, in that order. Derated numbers are calculated, not estimated. Nothing here is presented as a measured result, because we measure nothing.

Researched and written by Steven Eaton, editor of WC Safety. Steven holds no safety certification and does not test products; this page compares what manufacturers and regulators publish, with the gaps in that record marked. Last reviewed August 2026.

Previous article Toptes Pt520A Review

Leave a comment

* Required fields