Wells Lamont FX3 Cut Resistant Gloves Review (2026): ANSI A4 Cut Protection for Metal Fabrication And General Trade Work
Are the Wells Lamont FX3 cut resistant gloves the right A4 cut gloves for metal fabrication and general trade work?
Short answer: Yes โ the Wells Lamont FX3 Cut Resistant Gloves are a lightweight ANSI A4 cut glove with a steel-blend shell and nitrile palm at a value price. They carry a genuine ANSI/ISEA 105 A4 cut rating and land at about $10.61 a pair, undercutting most name-brand rivals. Buy them for metal fabrication and general trade work; if your hazard steps beyond cut, weigh the alternatives in our best cut-resistant gloves guide.
Wells Lamont FX3 Cut Resistant Gloves Review (2026)
The Wells Lamont FX3 Cut Resistant Gloves are an HPPE, stainless-steel, nylon and spandex shell with a nitrile-coated palm, rated ANSI/ISEA 105 A4 for cut resistance with grip and dexterity. This review covers how that protection is rated against the ANSI/ISEA 105 cut standard, who the glove fits, where it falls short, and how it compares to the rest of the cut-resistant gloves we stock โ including Ansell HyFlex 11-561, PIP MaxiFlex Cut 34-8743. For the wider field, start with our best cut-resistant gloves guide.
Editorial verdict โ 4.3/5. The Wells Lamont FX3 deliver dependable ANSI A4 cut protection at a value price, with a build tuned for metal fabrication and general trade work. The trade-offs are honest for the tier โ see the cons below โ but for the money this is one of the easier cut gloves to recommend.
VIEW ON WC SAFETY โ CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON โ
As an Amazon Associate, WC Safety earns from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are accurate as of the date shown and are subject to change. Full affiliate disclosure.
- Genuine ANSI A4 cut protection
- Stainless-steel-blend shell for durable cut resistance
- Nitrile-coated palm for grip and dexterity
- Lightweight, breathable build for all-day wear
- Strong value near $10 a pair
- Sized Medium through X-Large
- A4, not A5+ โ step up for heavier blade exposure
- No back-of-hand impact protection
- Not food-contact rated
- Coated palm is not a liquid barrier
Who the Wells Lamont FX3 is for
- Metal fabricators and sheet-metal handlers needing A4 cut protection with grip.
- General trades and warehousing wanting a lightweight, durable cut glove.
- Glass and HVAC handlers exposed to sharp edges.
- Value-focused buyers outfitting a crew at a low per-pair cost.
Browse the full cut-resistant gloves collection or the broader hand protection collection to compare, and see the best A5 cut-resistant gloves roundup for the neighboring tier.
What the Wells Lamont FX3 does well
Genuine ANSI A4 cut protection at a value price
The headline is the ANSI/ISEA 105 A4 rating, verified on the listing and mapped to the TDM-100 blade-cut test in our EN 388 explainer. What sets the Wells Lamont FX3 apart is delivering that A4 level at about $10.61 a pair, where comparable gloves often cost more โ see where it lands in the best cut-resistant gloves guide.
Grip and dexterity you'll actually keep on
Cut protection only works if the glove stays on the hand. The Wells Lamont FX3's build preserves the fingertip feel needed for real work, so crews are less likely to strip it off for "just one task" โ the behaviour behind most lacerations. Size it snug with the glove size chart.
Built for the job and easy to reorder
Reach for the Wells Lamont FX3 for metal fabrication and general trade work. It is a washable, reusable work glove โ not a disposable โ so a single pair amortizes across many shifts. When you standardize a crew, choose the ANSI level by task first, then buy by the size run from the cut-resistant gloves collection.
Where the Wells Lamont FX3 falls short
Cut-rated, not cut-proof
No glove is cut-proof, and an A4 rating describes lab cut resistance, not a guarantee. Use controlled technique and retire any pair once the shell nicks or wears through.
Single-hazard focus
This is a cut glove. It has no back-of-hand impact armor โ for knuckle hazards see ANSI/ISEA 138 impact-rated gloves โ and it is not a chemical or liquid barrier; for that, our chemical-resistant glove guide points the way. Match the glove to a documented hazard assessment.
Know the tier above and below
If your stock is thinner or sharper than this tier handles, step up; if you need maximum dexterity and less cut, step down. The A4 vs A5 guide and the cut vs impact comparison lay out the trade.
Wells Lamont FX3 vs the competitive set
Here's how the Wells Lamont FX3 stacks up against the cut gloves we stock in and around its tier:
| Glove | Cut | Shell | Coating | Best for | ~Price | Amazon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wells Lamont FX3 | A4 | HPPE/steel shell | Nitrile | Metal fab, general trade | $10.61 | Check โ |
| Ansell HyFlex 11-561 | A4 | Knit | Foam nitrile | Automotive/fabrication | $16.99 | Check โ |
| Ansell HyFlex 11-542 | A4 | Kevlar | Nitrile | Cut + contact heat | $35.00 | Check โ |
| PIP MaxiFlex Cut 34-8743 | A2 | Knit | Micro-foam nitrile | Max dexterity, lighter cut | $19.00 | Check โ |
As an Amazon Associate, WC Safety earns from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are accurate as of the date shown and are subject to change. Full affiliate disclosure.
How to choose between the Wells Lamont FX3 and its closest rivals
The nearest decisions are the Wells Lamont FX3 against Ansell HyFlex 11-561, PIP MaxiFlex Cut 34-8743. See the Ansell HyFlex 11-561 review. See the PIP MaxiFlex Cut 34-8743 review.
- Buy the Wells Lamont FX3 if you want A4 cut protection tuned for metal fabrication and general trade work at the lowest cost.
- Buy Ansell HyFlex 11-561 if you prefer its build for your specific task โ compare the two head-to-head before you standardize.
Shop these on Amazon โ HyFlex 11-561MaxiFlex Cut 34-8743Wells Lamont FX3
Category context: where the Wells Lamont FX3 sits
Cut gloves divide by cut level (A1โA9), shell, coating and added hazards. The Wells Lamont FX3 is a A4, coated, single-hazard cut glove tuned for metal fabrication and general trade work. Compare it against the wider field in the best cut-resistant gloves guide, the neighboring tier in best A5 cut-resistant gloves, and the coated-vs-uncoated trade in nitrile-coated vs PU-coated work gloves. Buyers also cross-shop the material-handling gloves and impact-resistant gloves lines.
Total cost of ownership
The Wells Lamont FX3's value rests on reuse. At about $10.61 and washable, a pair amortizes across many shifts where disposables would burn cash. Assuming a pair lasts weeks of daily use before the shell thins at high-wear points, the per-shift cost is low โ competitive with or cheaper than rival A4 gloves. Wash, air dry, and inspect the palm and fingertips before each shift; retire the glove once cut yarn shows through. Size and reorder from the glove size chart and the cut-resistant gloves collection.
Final verdict: Wells Lamont FX3 Cut Resistant Gloves
At 4.3/5, the Wells Lamont FX3 is a value pick for ANSI A4 cut protection tuned to metal fabrication and general trade work.
- Buy the Wells Lamont FX3 if you want A4 cut protection for metal fabrication and general trade work at the lowest cost.
- Buy Ansell HyFlex 11-561 if its build suits your task better.
- Step up a tier if you handle thinner or sharper stock than A4 covers โ see the best cut-resistant gloves guide.
VIEW ON WC SAFETY โ CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON โ
Wells Lamont FX3 cut resistant gloves: frequently asked questions
What ANSI cut level is the Wells Lamont FX3?
The Wells Lamont FX3 is rated ANSI/ISEA 105 A4. That describes lab cut resistance on the TDM-100 blade test, not a cut-proof guarantee โ match it to your hazard with the how to choose by ANSI level guide.
Is the Wells Lamont FX3 in stock and ready to ship?
Yes โ this listing is active and ships through Amazon. Select your size to see live availability and shipping speed.
What size Wells Lamont FX3 should I order?
Measure across your palm and use the glove size chart; a cut glove should fit snug so it does not bunch at the fingertips. A loose cut glove is a hazard.
Is the Wells Lamont FX3 good value versus other A4 gloves?
Yes โ at about $10.61 it undercuts most name-brand A4 rivals, and because it is washable the per-shift cost is low. See where it ranks in the best cut-resistant gloves guide.
Wells Lamont FX3 vs Ansell HyFlex 11-561 โ which should I buy?
Buy the Wells Lamont FX3 for metal fabrication and general trade work at the lowest cost; choose Ansell HyFlex 11-561 if its build suits your task better. Compare in the Ansell HyFlex 11-561 review.
Does the Wells Lamont FX3 protect against punctures or needles?
No โ cut level and puncture resistance are separate ratings, and this is a cut glove. For puncture or needle hazards, choose a dedicated needle-resistant glove.
Does the Wells Lamont FX3 have impact protection?
No โ it has no back-of-hand impact armor. For knuckle hazards, choose an impact-rated glove and read the ANSI/ISEA 138 impact standard.
Is the Wells Lamont FX3 machine washable?
Yes. It is a washable, reusable work glove โ wash on a normal cycle, air dry, and retire it once cut yarn shows through at the fingertips or palm.
Is the Wells Lamont FX3 food safe?
No โ it is not a food-contact glove. For food processing choose a food-safe cut glove from the best food-grade cut-resistant gloves guide.
What does the Wells Lamont FX3 NOT protect against?
It does not protect against punctures, impact, heat or chemicals, and it is not a liquid barrier. For those hazards see impact-rated gloves, heat-resistant gloves and the chemical-resistant glove guide.
Does the Wells Lamont FX3 work with touchscreens?
Touchscreen capability varies; check the linked listing for the exact size and finish you select.
How is the Wells Lamont FX3 different from a disposable glove?
It is a reusable knit work glove, not a single-use disposable โ it is washed and reused across many shifts, which is central to its value.
Should I buy the Wells Lamont FX3 or step up a cut tier?
If your task matches the A4 rating, this is the right pick; if you handle thinner or sharper stock, step up a level. The A4 vs A5 guide explains the jump.
Does the Wells Lamont FX3 meet OSHA requirements?
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.138 requires selecting hand protection from a documented hazard assessment rather than mandating a specific glove. A correctly chosen A4 glove satisfies the requirement for the laceration hazards it covers โ document the assessment.
Where can I read more about A4 cut gloves?
Start with our best cut-resistant gloves guide and the ANSI/ISEA 105 cut levels explainer; both map where A4 sits and what it stops.
Last reviewed: ยท Sources reviewed: ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 cut-resistance standard, EN 388:2016 mechanical-risk standard, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.138 hand protection, and the Wells Lamont Wells Lamont FX3 manufacturer specification.
Editorial standard: Zero sponsored listings. No manufacturer input. No paid placement. Cut level independently framed against the ANSI/ISEA 105 classification.
Leave a comment