Scott 67805 Jumbo Roll Toilet Paper (JRT) Review
Affiliate disclosure: WC Safety earns a commission on qualifying Amazon purchases at no extra cost to you.
Jumbo roll tissue is how high-traffic restrooms stop being a daily service stop: 1,000-foot rolls in locked dispensers that go a week where standard spindles go a shift. The 67805 adds 100% recycled fiber โ procurement's sustainability line covered at the listed price a case.
Editorial rating: 4.5/5. The right format wherever traffic is real; just confirm the dispenser first.
Scott 67805 Jumbo Roll Toilet Paper (12x1,000') โ current price and availability on Amazon:
Check Price on Amazon โKey specs
Published ยท Last updated
| Model | 67805 |
| Format | JRT โ 9" jumbo rolls |
| Length | 1,000 ft per roll, 12 rolls |
| Fiber | 100% recycled, septic-safe |
| Fits | Jumbo dispensers (check core/diameter) |
Amazon listing verified (2026-07-16) โ the button shows the live price.
Who it's for
Schools, venues, transit facilities, and any restroom where tissue service frequency is a labor line item worth attacking.
Skip it if
Buildings without jumbo dispensers โ JRT needs its hardware, and the core/diameter check comes before the case order, not after.
How it fits the facility safety program
Restroom paper is the most user-visible line in facility sanitation (29 CFR 1910.141 territory) โ format-to-hardware match (standard spindle vs jumbo dispenser) decides both the case to buy and the labor to service it. New to the department? Start at the janitorial & facility safety collection overview.
How it compares
vs Scott 04460: the zero-hardware standard-roll case. (Our take: full Scott 04460 review.)
vs enMotion 59460A: the towel half of a high-traffic restroom. (Our take: full enMotion 59460A review.)
Pros and cons
Pros
- 1,000 ft rolls slash service frequency
- 100% recycled, septic-safe
- Locked dispensers curb waste and theft
Cons
- Requires jumbo dispenser hardware
- Non-perforated roll tears vary by user
- Heavy rolls to handle and store
Build out the facility program
One product is a purchase; the program is what protects people. Map every dispenser-to-refill pairing in the dispenser compatibility guide, size every can with the trash liner calculator and the mil & micron decode, and rank the categories in our best-of guides for commercial paper towels, can liners, and wet floor signs. The safety context lives in the custodial worker safety hub with its floor stripping and cleaning chemical safety guides. Crews need nitrile gloves, chemical-resistant gloves, splash goggles, and slip-resistant footwear; liquid failures belong to spill control. Browse the department: janitorial & facility safety, paper towels & dispensers, trash can liners, wet floor signs โ case-lot orders via bulk & business orders.
Bottom line: if the Scott 67805 Jumbo Roll Toilet Paper (12x1,000') fits your facility program, check the live listing:
Check Price on Amazon โRelated janitorial reviews
- Scott 04460 Standard Roll Toilet Paper (80 Rolls) review
- Georgia-Pacific enMotion 59460A 10" Touchless Dispenser review
- GP enMotion Impulse 8" 59437A Touchless Dispenser review
- GP Pacific Blue Ultra 59590 8" Automated Dispenser review
- Tork Matic 5510282 H1 Roll Dispenser review
- Scott Essential 48860 Automatic Hard Roll Dispenser review
- GP SofPull 58204 Centerpull Dispenser review
Janitorial & facility supply FAQ
General questions about ratings, OSHA limits and fit are answered in the dispenser compatibility guide guide.
How we review
WC Safety reviews are spec-honest: we work from the manufacturer's published data and the live Amazon listing, flag any claim that exists only in listing copy ("per the listing"), and never invent certifications or test results. Ratings are editorial judgments about fit-for-duty at the captured price โ not aggregated user scores.
Sources
Manufacturer product pages and the Amazon listing linked above; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.22 (walking-working surfaces), 1910.141 (sanitation), 1910.1200 (hazard communication) as referenced; our own category testing of dispenser-refill pairings documented in the compatibility guide.
Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety โ workplace PPE review site and Amazon Associate. Pricing captured 2026-07-16; click through for current pricing.
Common questions
Standard roll vs jumbo (JRT) โ how do I choose?
Service frequency: standard rolls fit any spindle but need constant restock under traffic; 1,000-ft JRT rolls in locked dispensers go a week. Hardware determines the case, so check dispensers before ordering.
What does 2-ply vs 1-ply mean commercially?
2-ply standard rolls read as quality to users; commercial 1-ply and JRT trade feel for yield and control. Public-facing restrooms usually justify 2-ply; institutional traffic usually justifies JRT.
Is recycled-fiber tissue septic-safe?
The Scott 67805 line is 100% recycled and septic-safe per KC โ recycled content and dissolvability are independent specs, so check both lines on any case.
Why individually wrapped rolls?
Storage hygiene: wrapped rolls survive dusty closets and read as fresh at install. It matters more than it sounds in facilities where tissue stores near cleaning chemicals.
How much tissue does a facility burn?
Rough planning: one standard roll per employee-week in office settings, far more in public traffic. Count restrooms, watch two reorder cycles, then set par levels โ the case math beats guessing.
Sources. Requirements referenced here come from OSHA 29ย CFR 1910 and the NIOSH recommendations. Where a consensus standard governs, the ANSI document is named in the text.
Related reference
Related on this site: jumbo roll vs standard toilet paper: which tissue program?, paper towel dispenser compatibility guide: what fits enmotion, tork, custodial worker safety guide, scott purple core vs universal hard rolls: lock-in vs freedom, genuine vs compatible enmotion rolls: is the gp premium worth it?, and multifold vs c-fold paper towels: which folded format?.
Why trust WC Safety
WC Safety is an independent, affiliate-supported review site. It is not a retailer: it holds no inventory, takes no orders, and earns only from qualifying purchases through clearly marked links โ which never changes what a product is rated to do. Standards language is taken from the regulation text directly, and ratings are reported as the manufacturer publishes them. We run no laboratory and perform no testing of our own. Where published sources disagree, we say so and plan on the conservative figure rather than the flattering one.
Our methodology
Figures come from the regulation and the published specification, in that order. Derated numbers are calculated, not estimated. Nothing here is presented as a measured result, because we measure nothing.
Researched and written by Steven Eaton, editor of WC Safety. Steven holds no safety certification and does not test products; this page compares what manufacturers and regulators publish, with the gaps in that record marked. Last reviewed August 2026.
Leave a comment