Rubbermaid Slim Jim 23-Gallon Trash Can Review
Affiliate disclosure: WC Safety earns a commission on qualifying Amazon purchases at no extra cost to you.
The indoor standard: the Slim Jim's rectangle tucks against walls and under counters where round cans blockade aisles — the receptacle offices, kitchen lines, and copy rooms actually have room for. Vented like its BRUTE sibling, so bag pulls don't become a two-person job.
Editorial rating: 4.7/5. The right-shaped can for indoor reality; pair it with its geometry-cut liners and the fit is factory.
Rubbermaid Slim Jim 23 Gal Trash Can, Black — current price and availability on Amazon:
Check Price on Amazon →Key specs
Published · Last updated
| Capacity | 23 gallon |
| Shape | Rectangular, wall-hugging |
| Design | Venting channels |
| Color | Black |
Amazon listing verified (2026-07-17) — the button shows the live price.
Who it's for
Indoor collection at floorplate premium: offices, food service lines, healthcare corridors — anywhere the can's footprint is negotiated space.
Skip it if
Outdoor and grounds duty; the BRUTE's round mass handles weather and abuse the indoor rectangle wasn't built for.
How it fits the facility safety program
Receptacles are the fixed half of the waste program: vented pulls protect backs, matched liners end blowouts, and zoned round-vs-rectangle placement is route ergonomics in disguise. New to the department? Start at the janitorial & facility safety collection overview.
How it compares
vs Slim Jim liners: the matched 150-count case. (Our take: full Slim Jim liners review.)
vs BRUTE 44: the round heavyweight. (Our take: full BRUTE 44 review.)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Wall-hugging rectangle saves aisle space
- Venting channels on bag pulls
- Rubbermaid commercial duty
Cons
- 23 gallons fills fast at kitchen pace
- Black shows dust film
- Its liners are their own SKU (by design)
Build out the facility program
One product is a purchase; the program is what protects people. Decision tools: the dispenser compatibility guide, the trash liner size calculator, and the mil & micron decode. Ranked picks: paper towels, liners, wet floor signs, vacuums, carts, entrance mats, and eyewash stations. The safety context is the custodial worker safety hub with the chemical safety and floor stripping guides; crews run nitrile gloves, splash goggles, and slip-resistant footwear. Shop the department: janitorial & facility safety and its collections — equipment, liners, restroom, matting, eyewash — with case orders via bulk & business orders.
Bottom line: if the Rubbermaid Slim Jim 23 Gal Trash Can, Black fits your facility program, check the live listing:
Check Price on Amazon →Related janitorial reviews
- Rubbermaid BRUTE 44 Gal Vented Trash Can review
- Amazon Basics 32 Gal Round Trash Cans (2-Pack) review
- Tork Xpress 553028 H2 Multifold Dispenser review
- Tork MB540A H2 Multifold Towels (4,000/Case) review
- 33 Gallon Trash Bags 1.6-Mil (150ct) review
- 55-60 Gallon Trash Bags 2.1-Mil (100ct) review
- METRONIC 30-33 Gal Liners 0.6-Mil (250ct) review
Janitorial & facility supply FAQ
General questions about ratings, OSHA limits and fit are answered in the dispenser compatibility guide guide.
How we review
WC Safety reviews are spec-honest: we work from the manufacturer's published data and the live Amazon listing, flag any claim that exists only in listing copy ("per the listing"), and never invent certifications or test results. Ratings are editorial judgments about fit-for-duty at the captured price — not aggregated user scores.
Sources
Manufacturer product pages and the Amazon listing linked above; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.22, 1910.141, 1910.151, and 1910.1200 as referenced; ANSI/ISEA Z358.1 referenced for eyewash classification context, not reproduced.
Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety — workplace PPE review site and Amazon Associate. Pricing captured 2026-07-17; click through for current pricing.
Common questions
How does this Wave-4 gear fit the existing department?
It's the gap fill: mops for the buckets we already sold, receptacles for the liner program, JRT hardware for the tissue cases, cone signs for the doors A-frames can't hold, and the liner sizes the decode chart listed but the store didn't stock.
Why do vented trash cans matter?
Venting channels break the vacuum that full liners form against can walls — bag pulls stop being back-straining wrestling matches, and liners stop tearing at the worst moment. It's ergonomics engineering hiding in a garbage can.
Round or rectangular receptacles?
Floorplate decides: rounds (BRUTE class) take abuse and volume where space allows; rectangles (Slim Jim class) hug walls where aisle inches count. Most facilities run both, zoned.
How do receptacles pair with the liner program?
By the calculator's math: 44-gal BRUTE takes 40x46 liners, 32-gal rounds take 33-gal cases, 23-gal Slim Jims take rectangle-cut. Matched pairs end blowouts and the mid-shift improvisations.
What's the receptacle count for a facility?
One deskside per workstation (liner-serviced), one collection point per zone, plus dock and kitchen anchors. The cart tows deskside waste to collection points — cans, liners, and route design are one system.
Do trash cans need cleaning?
Monthly wash-downs (the drainage mat area or hose bay), immediate cleaning on liner failures — a foul can defeats every liner and deodorizer downstream. It's the forgotten task the odor complaints trace to.
Sources. Requirements referenced here come from OSHA 29 CFR 1910 and the NIOSH recommendations. Where a consensus standard governs, the ANSI document is named in the text.
Related reference
Related on this site: 16-25 gallon trash bags, 33 gallon trash bags, 55-60 gallon trash bags, trash bag sizes for common cans: brute, slim jim, office & toter (chart), brute vs slim jim trash cans, and best trash can liners.
Why trust WC Safety
WC Safety is an independent, affiliate-supported review site. It is not a retailer: it holds no inventory, takes no orders, and earns only from qualifying purchases through clearly marked links — which never changes what a product is rated to do. Standards language is taken from the regulation text directly, and ratings are reported as the manufacturer publishes them. We run no laboratory and perform no testing of our own. Where published sources disagree, we say so and plan on the conservative figure rather than the flattering one.
Our methodology
Figures come from the regulation and the published specification, in that order. Derated numbers are calculated, not estimated. Nothing here is presented as a measured result, because we measure nothing.
Researched and written by Steven Eaton, editor of WC Safety. Steven holds no safety certification and does not test products; this page compares what manufacturers and regulators publish, with the gaps in that record marked. Last reviewed August 2026.
Leave a comment