Skip to content
Industrial Safety Equipment, PPE Guides & Reviews
Industrial Safety Equipment, PPE Guides & Reviews
33 Gallon Trash Bags — 1.6 Mil, 150-Count product photo

33 Gallon Trash Bags Review

Affiliate disclosure: WC Safety earns a commission on qualifying Amazon purchases at no extra cost to you.

The middle size the lineup was missing: 33-gallon at an honest 1.6 mil — the standard round office and kitchen can between deskside and Brute class, covered at 29 cents a liner in a 150-count case.

Editorial rating: 4.4/5. The missing row in the size chart, filled at the right gauge; the two-SKU liner program becomes three where mid-size cans are the fleet.

33 Gallon Trash Bags 1.6-Mil (150ct) — current price and availability on Amazon:

Check Price on Amazon →

Key specs

Published · Last updated

Capacity 33 gallon
Gauge 1.6 mil LLDPE
Count 150
Color Black

Amazon listing verified (2026-07-17) — the button shows the live price.

Who it's for

The 30-33 gallon receptacle fleet most buildings run in kitchens, break rooms, and utility spaces — including the 32-gallon value cans in our receptacle lineup.

Skip it if

Light paper-only duty (the 0.6-mil economy case does that for half the per-liner cost) and true debris (contractor class).

How it fits the facility safety program

Waste containment is exposure control: right-density, right-size liners keep sharps and liquids inside the bag. Density to waste stream, size from the can's math — the calculator does the arithmetic. New to the department? Start at the janitorial & facility safety collection overview.

How it compares

vs METRONIC 0.6-mil: the economy version of the same size. (Our take: full METRONIC 0.6-mil review.)

vs Top Knot 45-gal: the size up. (Our take: full Top Knot 45-gal review.)

Pros and cons

Pros

  • 1.6 mil handles real mixed waste
  • 150-count case runs a quarter
  • Fills the 33x39 size-chart row

Cons

  • Overkill for pure paper waste
  • Generic sourcing — verify seam quality on case one
  • Black film hides sharps

Build out the facility program

One product is a purchase; the program is what protects people. Decision tools: the dispenser compatibility guide, the trash liner size calculator, and the mil & micron decode. Ranked picks: paper towels, liners, wet floor signs, vacuums, carts, entrance mats, and eyewash stations. The safety context is the custodial worker safety hub with the chemical safety and floor stripping guides; crews run nitrile gloves, splash goggles, and slip-resistant footwear. Shop the department: janitorial & facility safety and its collections — equipment, liners, restroom, matting, eyewash — with case orders via bulk & business orders.

Bottom line: if the 33 Gallon Trash Bags 1.6-Mil (150ct) fits your facility program, check the live listing:

Check Price on Amazon →

Janitorial & facility supply FAQ

General questions about ratings, OSHA limits and fit are answered in the dispenser compatibility guide guide.

How we review

WC Safety reviews are spec-honest: we work from the manufacturer's published data and the live Amazon listing, flag any claim that exists only in listing copy ("per the listing"), and never invent certifications or test results. Ratings are editorial judgments about fit-for-duty at the captured price — not aggregated user scores.

Sources

Manufacturer product pages and the Amazon listing linked above; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.22, 1910.141, 1910.151, and 1910.1200 as referenced; ANSI/ISEA Z358.1 referenced for eyewash classification context, not reproduced.

Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety — workplace PPE review site and Amazon Associate. Pricing captured 2026-07-17; click through for current pricing.

Common questions

How does this Wave-4 gear fit the existing department?

It's the gap fill: mops for the buckets we already sold, receptacles for the liner program, JRT hardware for the tissue cases, cone signs for the doors A-frames can't hold, and the liner sizes the decode chart listed but the store didn't stock.

What do mil and micron ratings actually mean?

Mil is thousandths of an inch on low-density (LLDPE) bags; micron is thousandths of a millimeter on high-density (HDPE) film. Different materials, different failure modes — our decode guide has the full charts.

How do I pick the right gauge?

Density to waste stream first (LLDPE for mixed and edged waste, HDPE for light dry), then gauge to weight: 0.6-mil for light fill, 1.1-1.6 for working duty, 2+ mil for heavy loads, 3-mil for debris. Overspending on gauge is the most common liner mistake.

Why do rectangular cans need special liners?

Geometry: round-cut bags on Slim Jim rectangles bunch in corners and shortchange overhang — the fit failure that dumps bags into cans. Rectangle-cut liners match the perimeter and hang correctly.

What size liner fits my can?

Width = half the can's circumference; length = height + bottom reach + 3-4 inches of overhang. The free liner size calculator does the math and names the standard size to order.

Why does overhang matter so much?

The 3-4 inches folded over the rim is what carries the load — bags gripped only by friction slide in as they fill. Right-size liners with real overhang are the difference between a bag pull and an excavation.

Sources. Requirements referenced here come from OSHA 29 CFR 1910 and the NIOSH recommendations. Where a consensus standard governs, the ANSI document is named in the text.

Related reference

Related reading in this area: 16-25 gallon trash bags, 55-60 gallon trash bags, trash bag sizes for common cans: brute, slim jim, office & toter (chart), and brute vs slim jim trash cans.

Why trust WC Safety

WC Safety is an independent, affiliate-supported review site. It is not a retailer: it holds no inventory, takes no orders, and earns only from qualifying purchases through clearly marked links — which never changes what a product is rated to do. Standards language is taken from the regulation text directly, and ratings are reported as the manufacturer publishes them. We run no laboratory and perform no testing of our own. Where published sources disagree, we say so and plan on the conservative figure rather than the flattering one.

Our methodology

Figures come from the regulation and the published specification, in that order. Derated numbers are calculated, not estimated. Nothing here is presented as a measured result, because we measure nothing.

Researched and written by Steven Eaton, editor of WC Safety. Steven holds no safety certification and does not test products; this page compares what manufacturers and regulators publish, with the gaps in that record marked. Last reviewed August 2026.

Previous article Toptes Pt520A Review

Leave a comment

* Required fields