Skip to content
Industrial Safety Equipment, PPE Guides & Reviews
Industrial Safety Equipment, PPE Guides & Reviews

Msa Gmt Multi Gas Cartridge Review

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, WC Safety earns from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Commissions do not influence our review.

★★★★½ 4.6/5

Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety Editorial

MSA GMT Respirator Cartridge — Multi-Gas (MSA Comfo) — Key Details
Brand MSA Safety
Category Respirator Cartridge
Model / SKU 806059

The MSA GMT Respirator Cartridge — Multi-Gas (MSA Comfo) is a respirator cartridge from MSA Safety, listed on Amazon. This review restates what the product page documents, places it in its respiratory protection lane, and points to the ranked guides for the head-to-head field.

What the Product Page Documents

Published · Last updated

Best For: multi-gas exposure with little or no dust on MSA Comfo respirators.

Not For: dust, mist or gases outside its approved list. It is a gas cartridge only.

Bottom Line: the gas-only multi-gas choice for the MSA Comfo system. Add dust protection with the GME/P100 when particulate is present.

Where It Earns Its Slot

The GMT is MSA's other Comfo multi-gas cartridge — the same gas-only, low-dust brief as the GME, scored a step lower here (4.4/5) because for the common mixed-vapor surveys we evaluate, its sibling's documented coverage fits more of them. That is a fit verdict, not a quality one: where the GMT's approval list matches your named agents, it is exactly the right cartridge.

The decision set is short: the GME for the broader common-survey fit, the GMC/P100 when dust joins the exposure, and dedicated cartridges for ammonia or formaldehyde, which no GM-family cartridge covers. On cartridges, the NIOSH approval list is the entire specification.

Honest Limits

Gas-only means gas-only: the GMT has no particulate element, so dusty work either adds the combination cartridge or an approved prefilter arrangement. Service life follows the shortest-lived bed for your gas mix — schedule changes from data per 1910.134, and treat any odor or irritation as an incident, not a change reminder.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Documented respirator cartridge from MSA Safety
  • Model 806059 — traceable part number
  • Listing-grounded specs — nothing invented here

Cons

  • Configuration options live on the linked listing
  • Where the listing is silent on a rating, verify the physical markings

Alternatives in the Same Lane

Respiratory Protection Guides

Browse by Category

Frequently Asked Questions

General questions about ratings, OSHA limits and fit are answered in the When Do You Need a Respirator? guide.

How much does the MSA GMT Respirator Cartridge — Multi-Gas (MSA Comfo) cost?

current pricing at the linked listing — prices track the live page, and configuration choices there can shift the number.

The Bottom Line

Rated 4.4/5. Pick the GMT when its approval list matches your survey's agents on a Comfo facepiece in low-dust work; pick the GME when the broader common fit serves better. Either way the cartridge is only ever as good as the match between its approval and your assessment.


About the Author

Steven Eaton is the founder of WC Safety and an industrial PPE specialist who sources and evaluates respiratory protection equipment for industrial and construction buyers.

How We Review

Respiratory reviews restate NIOSH approvals, filter classes, and compatibility exactly as listed — cartridge pairings follow the manufacturer's attachment rules (retainers where required, direct-attach where designed), and every tight-fitting respirator assumes the annual fit test our kits collection now sells. Ratings reflect documented spec, configuration, and value — the basis is stated, not invented testing.

Affiliate Disclosure

WC Safety is an Amazon Associate and earns commissions on qualifying purchases through links on this page. Affiliate relationships do not influence our ratings.

Editorial Standards

Claims are drawn from listing data and published standards. WC Safety does not invent specifications or test results. Report errors to safetynw2012@gmail.com.

Common questions

What does the MSA GMT Respirator Cartridge — Multi-Gas (MSA Comfo) listing actually document?

Best For: multi-gas exposure with little or no dust on MSA Comfo respirators.…

What are the alternatives to the MSA GMT Respirator Cartridge — Multi-Gas (MSA Comfo)?

The sibling respirator cartridge options linked in this review, ranked head-to-head in the respiratory protection guides below — start with the buyer's guides for the field view.

Why does the GMT score below the GME?

Coverage fit for the surveys we most often see, not build quality. Both are Comfo multi-gas cartridges; our 4.4 vs 4.7 reflects which approval list matched more of the common mixed-vapor exposure sets during review. Your own agent list can reverse that verdict.

Can I add dust protection to the GMT?

The cleaner route in this family is switching to the GMC/P100 combination cartridge rather than improvising. Prefilter arrangements exist only where the approval explicitly supports them — an unapproved stack voids the protection on paper and in fact.

How many gases can one cartridge really handle?

As many as its NIOSH approval lists, at the concentrations service-life data supports — and mixed exposure drains beds unevenly, so the schedule follows the shortest life among the gases actually present. More gas classes never means longer life.

Is a multi-gas cartridge safer than a targeted one?

Not inherently. A targeted cartridge matched to a single named hazard often lasts longer and breathes easier; multi-gas earns its place when the survey genuinely names multiple vapor families. Choose from the assessment, not from breadth for its own sake.

Related reference

Closely related on this site: best 3m multi gas cartridge, co detector placement guide 2026, and ov vs ov ag vs multi gas cartridge guide.

Why trust WC Safety

WC Safety is an independent, affiliate-supported review site. It is not a retailer: it holds no inventory, takes no orders, and earns only from qualifying purchases through clearly marked links — which never changes what a product is rated to do. Standards language is taken from the regulation text directly, and ratings are reported as the manufacturer publishes them. We run no laboratory and perform no testing of our own. Where published sources disagree, we say so and plan on the conservative figure rather than the flattering one.

Our methodology

Figures come from the regulation and the published specification, in that order. Derated numbers are calculated, not estimated. Nothing here is presented as a measured result, because we measure nothing.

Researched and written by Steven Eaton, editor of WC Safety. Steven holds no safety certification and does not test products; this page compares what manufacturers and regulators publish, with the gaps in that record marked. Last reviewed August 2026.

Previous article Toptes Pt520A Review

Leave a comment

* Required fields