Skip to content
Industrial Safety Equipment & PPE — ANSI/OSHA Compliant
Industrial Safety Equipment & PPE — ANSI/OSHA Compliant
SAS 6101-B Corded Earplugs — NRR 32 product photo

SAS 6101-B Review: NRR 32 Corded Foam

SAS 6101-B Review: NRR 32 Corded Foam — the short answer

Short answer: this sas 6101-b review covers corded polyurethane foam plugs at NRR 32 - near the top of what any earplug is rated at, and foam qualifies for the gentler 50 percent NIOSH tier rather than the 70 percent other plug types get. The reviewed listing is live here; plan the exposure on the derated figure, not on NRR 32. Everything in this family is used under OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95, which means a hearing conservation program once the 85 dBA action level is reached: noise monitoring, a baseline and then annual audiograms, a real choice of protectors at no cost, and annual training.

Industrial Hearing Protection That Stays With You

Published · Last updated

SAS Safety Corp Corded Foam Earplugs 100 Pairs Review (2026)

Bulk-pack corded foam earplugs are the daily backbone of any industrial hearing conservation program. The SAS Safety 6101-B earns its place on the shelf with an NRR 32 dB rating under ANSI S3.19, a cord that keeps plugs paired and accountable, and 100 pairs per box — enough to stock a safety cabinet for a full quarter without reordering. This review breaks down exactly what you get, where it competes, and whether it belongs in your workplace.

At WC Safety we evaluate hearing protection against the OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 hearing conservation standard. That means we look past marketing copy and focus on real-world attenuation, insertion ergonomics, compliance fit for supervisors running programs, and cost-per-pair economics. If you manage a warehouse, construction site, or manufacturing floor, those four factors are what matter when you buy 100 pairs at a time.

The SAS 6101-B is a pre-shaped, roll-and-insert foam plug with a low-profile connecting cord. It is certified to ANSI S3.19, meets OSHA 1910.95 program requirements, and ships in bulk quantities purpose-built for industrial use. Read on for our full assessment.

4.5 ★★★★☆ / 5 — WC Safety Verdict

Bottom line: A dependable NRR 32 corded foam earplug in a 100-pair bulk format. Solid compliance choice for industrial hearing-conservation programs at a competitive cost-per-pair.

Disclosure: WC Safety earns a commission on qualifying Amazon purchases at no extra cost to you.

✓ Pros

  • NRR 32 dB — top-tier foam attenuation
  • ANSI S3.19 certified, OSHA 1910.95 compliant
  • 100 pairs per box — efficient bulk value
  • Cord keeps plugs paired, reduces loss in the field
  • Soft pre-shaped foam, broad insertion compatibility
  • Competitive cost-per-pair for large teams

✗ Cons

  • Disposable only — not reusable across shifts
  • Cord adds bulk versus cordless options
  • Pre-shaped foam may not seal optimally in small ear canals
  • OSHA derating reduces effective protection to ~13 dB real-world

Who These Earplugs Are For

The SAS 6101-B is built for safety managers, supervisors, and purchasing agents who need to stock a hearing-conservation cabinet and keep it stocked. One hundred pairs in a box means less frequent reorders, lower per-unit cost, and simplified inventory tracking. The cord feature is a deliberate compliance aid — it keeps both plugs together and makes it visually obvious when a worker is wearing their protection, which simplifies floor audits.

These are not the right pick for a worker who wants a premium custom-fit experience or who switches frequently between loud and moderate environments. For workers weighing reusable vs disposable earplugs, this product sits firmly in the disposable, single-use category. If you have a high-headcount environment where hygiene and plug loss are recurring issues — construction, manufacturing, landscaping, grinding operations — the 100-pair bulk corded format is purpose-built for that problem.

The product is also a fit for any operation where OSHA 1910.95 compliance documentation matters. Corded earplugs are inherently easier to audit than loose plugs, which benefits both the employer and the industrial hygienist conducting noise exposure assessments. Browse the full earplugs collection at WC Safety or the broader hearing protection catalog to compare formats.

Strengths in Detail

1. NRR 32 dB — Maximum-Category Foam Protection

Under ANSI S3.19, the SAS 6101-B earns an NRR of 32 dB. That places it among the highest-rated disposable foam earplugs on the market. NRR 32 is the ceiling for most commercial foam designs, achieved through the material's ability to expand uniformly within the ear canal and block high-frequency noise — the frequencies most damaging to the inner ear over time with repeated exposure.

It is critical to understand what NRR means in practice. ANSI S3.19 testing is conducted in a laboratory under ideal fitting conditions with trained subjects. OSHA's accepted derating methodology for single-number ratings (divide NRR−7 by 2) yields approximately 13 dB of real-world attenuation. That figure still provides meaningful protection: a worker exposed to 95 dBA continuous noise would experience a protected exposure of approximately 82 dBA — below both the OSHA 85 dBA action level and the 90 dBA PEL under 29 CFR 1910.95.

For a deeper breakdown of how NRR translates to job-site protection levels, see our complete NRR guide for hearing protection.

2. ANSI S3.19 and OSHA 1910.95 Compliance

The 6101-B carries ANSI S3.19 certification — the standard that governs hearing protector attenuation testing in the United States. This certification is a prerequisite for inclusion in a formal OSHA hearing conservation program under 29 CFR 1910.95. Any employer operating a hearing conservation program is required to provide hearing protectors that have been tested and rated under an accepted standard; ANSI S3.19 satisfies that requirement.

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 mandates hearing conservation programs for workers exposed to time-weighted average (TWA) noise levels at or above 85 dBA. At the 90 dBA PEL, employers must provide hearing protection and workers must use it. The SAS 6101-B, with its ANSI-certified NRR 32, is an appropriate selection for environments from 85 dBA up to approximately 103 dBA TWA (using OSHA derating). For our full regulatory breakdown, visit the hearing conservation program compliance guide.

3. Cord System: Compliance Accountability and Plug Retention

The connecting cord is not merely a convenience feature — it serves an active compliance function. Workers who remove earplugs for brief conversations tend to set them down and forget them. A cord keeps both plugs physically attached to the worker; when removed, they hang at chest level rather than disappearing into a pocket or onto the floor. For supervisors conducting floor audits, a corded earplug is visually confirmable at a glance from across a work cell.

The cord also mitigates contamination concerns. Loose plugs set on dirty surfaces can accumulate oils, grit, or chemical residue before reinsertion. A corded design keeps them off surfaces between uses. In environments with regulated contaminant exposure, this is a small but legitimate hygiene advantage that also supports OSHA 1910.95 program integrity.

4. 100-Pair Bulk Format — Program Economics

For safety programs with ongoing earplug consumption, the 100-pair box meaningfully reduces per-unit cost compared to smaller packs. A single box serves a crew of 20 workers for one to two weeks of daily replacement — standard practice under most hearing conservation programs, which typically require fresh plugs each shift. The bulk format reduces purchasing frequency, simplifies storage, and keeps per-pair cost at a level that makes daily disposal economically sustainable without straining a safety budget.

Compare bulk options and NRR ranges across brands in the WC Safety foam earplug collection. For a curated comparison of top performers, see best foam earplugs and best earplugs for work.

5. Soft Pre-Shaped Foam — Broad Insertion Compatibility

Pre-shaped foam plugs are contoured to approximate average ear canal geometry, reducing the technique skill required for correct insertion. The roll-compress-insert method still applies — the user rolls the plug to a thin cylinder, compresses it, inserts it, then holds it gently while it expands — but the pre-shaping helps guide correct depth and orientation. This is a meaningful ergonomic advantage in environments where workers have varying earplug experience or where fit training is limited to a brief onboarding session.

Weaknesses to Consider

1. Disposable Only — Cumulative Material Cost at Scale

The 6101-B is a single-use disposable earplug. For environments where workers use one pair per shift, five days a week, the annual consumption per worker is approximately 250 pairs. At 100 pairs per box, that is 2.5 boxes per worker per year. At scale across a large workforce, this adds up and generates ongoing material waste. Programs looking to reduce recurring cost and environmental footprint should compare against reusable earplug options, which carry a higher unit cost but far lower total consumption over time.

2. Cord Bulk and Tangle Potential

The connecting cord is a net positive for compliance, but it introduces minor ergonomic friction. The cord can tangle with tool lanyards, loose clothing, or other PPE layers when stored or worn around the neck. Workers unaccustomed to corded designs sometimes report the cord as distracting during overhead work or when wearing full-brim hard hats. This is not a disqualifying issue, but it is worth noting for job sites where workers also layer face shields, respirators, or neck-strap safety glasses — each PPE layer adds cord-management complexity.

3. OSHA Derating Narrows Effective Protection Window

The headline NRR 32 dB rating can create false confidence if applied at face value. OSHA's accepted derating methodology yields approximately 13 dB of real-world protection — not 32 dB. The 6101-B is appropriate for environments up to approximately 103 dBA TWA as the sole hearing protector. Environments exceeding that level require dual protection (earplugs plus earmuffs) or a higher-attenuation device. Employers must verify TWA measurements before specifying any earplug as the sole hearing protector in their program.

4. Fit Variability in Non-Average Ear Canals

Pre-shaped foam plugs are designed around average adult ear canal geometry. Workers with small or unusually shaped canals may achieve less-than-labeled attenuation. Mature hearing conservation programs should offer multiple earplug styles to accommodate anatomical variation — OSHA 1910.95 recommends offering a variety of hearing protectors where feasible. The 6101-B is an excellent primary option but should not be the only option in a well-designed program.

Competitor Comparison

How does the SAS 6101-B stack up against comparable bulk corded foam earplugs? The table below compares key specifications across leading options in the WC Safety hearing protection catalog.

Product NRR Type Qty/Box Corded Buy
SAS Safety 6101-B 32 dB Foam 100 pr Yes Amazon ↗
3M E-A-R Classic 29 dB Foam 200 pr No View
Howard Leight MAX-1 33 dB Foam 100–500 Optional View
Moldex Pura-Fit 33 dB Foam 200 pr Optional View

Competitor NRR values sourced from published ANSI S3.19 data sheets. Pricing varies by retailer and date.

SAS Safety Earplug Series Overview

SAS Safety offers multiple hearing protection formats for different workplace requirements. Choose based on NRR, cord preference, and reusability needs:

  • SAS 6101-B Corded Foam (this product): NRR 32, 100 pairs, corded — best for programs prioritizing accountability and bulk value
  • Cordless disposable foam: NRR-equivalent without cord bulk — ideal for workers who find cords distracting during overhead or confined-space work
  • Reusable banded plugs: Lower per-use cost at scale for intermittent exposure environments where daily disposal is not required

Not sure which format fits your program? Our guide on best earplugs for work walks through NRR selection, cord vs cordless tradeoffs, and program-level buying considerations. Also see best hearing protection for a cross-category comparison including ear muffs and banded options.

Complementary PPE and Accessories

Hearing protection rarely operates in isolation. In environments requiring dual protection or multi-hazard PPE layers, consider pairing the SAS 6101-B with compatible equipment from the WC Safety PPE collection:

  • Ear muffs — for dual protection in environments exceeding 103 dBA TWA; OSHA guidance recommends wearing earplugs and earmuffs simultaneously above that threshold
  • Hearing protection dispenser stations — keeps bulk earplug packs organized and accessible at plant entry points or tool cribs
  • Noise dosimeters and sound level meters — required for establishing accurate TWA baselines under an OSHA 1910.95 program; specifying the correct NRR-rated plug starts with verified dosimetry data

OSHA and ANSI S3.19 Standards Context

Understanding the regulatory and testing framework behind earplug ratings is essential for anyone specifying hearing protection at the program level. Here is the framework applied to the SAS 6101-B:

ANSI S3.19 — The NRR Test Standard

ANSI S3.19 (American National Standard for the Measurement of Real-Ear Attenuation at Threshold) governs how hearing protector attenuation is measured in the United States. Under this method, trained laboratory subjects fit the hearing protector under supervised conditions, and real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) is measured across multiple test frequencies. The result is a single-number Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) in decibels. The SAS 6101-B's NRR of 32 dB is derived from this standard. All hearing protectors sold in the U.S. with an NRR label have been tested under ANSI S3.19 or its predecessor.

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 — Occupational Noise Exposure

OSHA's general industry hearing conservation standard at 29 CFR 1910.95 establishes two key thresholds: the action level (AL) of 85 dBA TWA, which triggers a hearing conservation program requirement, and the PEL of 90 dBA TWA, at which hearing protection use is mandatory. The standard also requires that selected hearing protection be adequate to reduce worker noise exposure to at least the action level.

Using OSHA's derating formula — (NRR − 7) ÷ 2 — the SAS 6101-B provides approximately 12.5 dB of effective attenuation, rounded to ~13 dB. Applied examples: a worker at 95 dBA TWA achieves a protected exposure of ~82 dBA (below both the AL and PEL); a worker at 103 dBA achieves ~90 dBA (at the PEL limit). Above 103 dBA, dual protection is required. For comprehensive program implementation details, see our hearing conservation program guide.

Total Cost of Ownership

For purchasing managers and safety directors, the per-unit price is only part of the equation. The table below frames annual cost for a 20-worker crew comparing the SAS 6101-B against a reusable alternative:

Factor SAS 6101-B (Disposable) Reusable Earplug (est.)
Unit cost ~$0.37/pair $1.50–$4.00/unit
Annual pairs per worker ~250 (1/shift) 2–4 (replaced on wear)
Annual cost per worker ~$92.50 $3.00–$16.00
Annual cost / 20 workers ~$1,850 $60–$320

Estimates based on approximate market pricing at time of review. Actual costs vary by supplier and usage rate. See reusable vs disposable earplugs for a full TCO analysis across earplug categories.

The disposable format remains the correct choice in environments where plug sharing, contamination, or loss is a recurring operational problem. For clean environments with trained workers and stable headcount, reusables often win on long-run cost. The SAS 6101-B's TCO is competitive within the disposable segment due to its bulk-pack pricing structure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the NRR of the SAS Safety 6101-B earplugs?

The SAS Safety 6101-B has an NRR of 32 dB as measured under ANSI S3.19. Under OSHA's accepted derating methodology, effective real-world attenuation is approximately 13 dB.

Are these earplugs OSHA compliant?

Yes. The 6101-B is certified under ANSI S3.19 and is appropriate for use in OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 hearing conservation programs for environments up to approximately 103 dBA TWA when worn alone. Above that level, dual protection is recommended.

How many pairs come in a box?

Each box of SAS Safety 6101-B contains 100 pairs of corded foam earplugs.

Are the SAS 6101-B earplugs reusable?

No. These are single-use disposable earplugs. Replace after each shift or whenever the foam becomes soiled, compressed, or damaged. For reusable options, see our reusable vs disposable earplug guide.

What does the cord do?

The connecting cord keeps both earplugs paired and attached to the worker when removed from the ears. It reduces plug loss, simplifies floor compliance audits (plugs hang visibly from the neck), and minimizes surface contamination from set-down plugs.

How do I insert foam earplugs correctly?

Roll the earplug between your fingers to compress it to a thin cylinder. Reach over your head with the opposite hand to pull the ear canal open, insert the compressed plug, and hold it gently for 20–30 seconds while it expands to fill the canal. Correct insertion is the single largest factor in achieving rated attenuation — improper insertion can reduce effective NRR by 10 dB or more.

What noise levels are these earplugs rated for?

Using OSHA's derating formula, the SAS 6101-B provides approximately 13 dB of effective attenuation, making it appropriate as the sole hearing protector for TWA noise levels up to approximately 103 dBA. For louder environments, pair with ear muffs for dual protection.

What ANSI standard governs earplug NRR ratings?

ANSI S3.19 governs hearing protector attenuation testing in the United States. It specifies the real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) test method used to generate NRR values. All U.S.-market earplugs with an NRR label were tested under this standard or its predecessor.

Can I use these earplugs with earmuffs?

Yes. Dual protection — wearing both earplugs and earmuffs simultaneously — is standard practice for environments exceeding 103 dBA TWA. When combining protectors, do not add the two NRR values directly; effective combined attenuation is typically 5–10 dB above whichever protector has the higher NRR. Browse compatible ear muffs at WC Safety.

What industries are these earplugs best suited for?

Construction, manufacturing, landscaping, grinding, stamping, woodworking, and any industrial environment requiring an OSHA hearing conservation program. The corded bulk-pack format is particularly well-suited for high-headcount programs where daily plug replacement and compliance auditing are operational priorities.

How does the OSHA derating formula work for NRR 32 earplugs?

OSHA's accepted derating formula: (NRR − 7) ÷ 2 = effective attenuation. For NRR 32: (32 − 7) ÷ 2 = 12.5 dB, approximately 13 dB of real-world protection. This accounts for the difference between laboratory fit conditions and real-world worker fit variability. See our NRR guide for a full breakdown with worked examples.

Are these earplugs suitable for workers with small ear canals?

Pre-shaped foam plugs target average adult ear canal geometry. Workers with smaller or unusually shaped canals may achieve less-than-labeled attenuation. Mature programs should offer multiple earplug styles to accommodate anatomical variation, as recommended under OSHA 1910.95.

Why Trust WC Safety Reviews

WC Safety is an independent safety equipment review site. Our reviews are grounded in published specifications, ANSI and OSHA standards documentation, and hands-on product evaluation. We do not fabricate attenuation claims, manufacturing claims, or user statistics. All NRR figures cited in this review are drawn from published ANSI S3.19 data. No claims are made beyond what the standard or the product's own data sheet supports. We earn a commission on qualifying Amazon purchases but that does not influence our ratings or conclusions.

Reviewed by Steven Eaton — Safety Equipment Specialist, WC Safety Editorial

Steven Eaton reviews industrial PPE for WC Safety with a focus on OSHA compliance, ANSI standards, and real-world program applicability. All reviews are based on published specifications and regulatory standards.

Reviewed: June 2026 | Next scheduled review: December 2026

Our Methodology

WC Safety earplug reviews evaluate products against ANSI S3.19 published NRR ratings, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 regulatory requirements, physical design features (cord, material, shape), bulk-format economics, and fit compatibility. We do not conduct independent acoustic testing. All attenuation claims reflect published ANSI S3.19 data and OSHA-standard derating calculations only.

Affiliate Disclosure: WC Safety participates in the Amazon Associates Program. Links marked with ↗ on this page include the affiliate tag wcsafety04-20 and may earn WC Safety a commission on qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. This does not affect our editorial assessment or ratings.

NRR 32 on the 6101-B — and the two numbers that replace it

The rating on the packet is an EPA label figure measured under ANSI S3.19 in a laboratory, on trained subjects, with a perfect fit. Two standard corrections bring it back to what a real shift looks like.

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95: (32 − 7) ÷ 2 = 12.5 dB
NIOSH: this plug is derated 50%, leaving about 16 dB

Which NIOSH tier applies depends on the material, not the shape. NIOSH derates earmuffs 25%, formable foam earplugs 50%, and every other earplug type 70%. This one is described by the manufacturer as corded single-use polyurethane foam plugs. It is formable polyurethane foam, so the 50% tier applies.

  • A plug that is not seated is not protecting you, and it looks fine. That is the reason NIOSH is harder on plugs than on muffs: a half-inserted plug is invisible, while a lifted muff cushion is obvious within a minute.
  • Roll, insert, hold. Foam needs to be compressed thin, inserted deep, and held while it expands. A flanged plug needs the ear canal straightened and the flanges pushed past the first bend. Neither works if you rush it.
  • Fit training beats a higher number. The gap between the label and the derated figure is entirely about fit, so an hour of training moves real protection further than two points of NRR ever will.

Fit beats rating, every time

A foam earplug only works if it is rolled down thin, inserted deep enough, and held while it expands. A plug resting in the outer ear can deliver a small fraction of its rating — the difference between a good and a poor insertion is far larger than the difference between an NRR 27 plug and an NRR 33 one.

  • Roll the whole plug into a thin crease-free cylinder, do not just pinch the tip.
  • Pull the ear up and back with the opposite hand to straighten the canal before inserting.
  • Hold for the full expansion time — releasing early is the commonest error, and the plug backs out as it expands.
  • Check it. With plugs seated correctly, your own voice sounds hollow and muffled. If it sounds normal, they are not in.

Where a program needs evidence rather than technique, fit testing for hearing protection exists and produces a measured personal attenuation rating for the individual — the hearing equivalent of a respirator fit test, and far more informative than any label.

Related hearing protection

Foam and reusable plugs sit under corded ear plugs, within the wider hearing protection range. Where plugs cannot be worn — ear infections, frequent on-off cycles, or a workforce that will not insert them consistently — ear muffs are the more reliable choice because their fit is far less technique-dependent. For intermittent noise where hearing speech between exposures matters, see banded ear plugs.

What using one of these legally requires

An earplug is not a compliance strategy on its own. Where noise exposure reaches the action level, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 requires a hearing conservation program, and the protector is one part of it:

  • The action level is an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA. At or above it the employer must run the program. The permissible exposure limit is 90 dBA as an 8-hour TWA, on a 5 dB exchange rate — so 95 dBA is a 4-hour exposure and 100 dBA a two-hour one. NIOSH recommends a lower 85 dBA limit on a 3 dB exchange.
  • Monitoring comes first. A noise survey establishes who is exposed and to what. Choosing a protector by its rating without knowing the level it has to bring down is guesswork in both directions.
  • Audiometric testing. A baseline audiogram within six months of first exposure, then annually. That test — not the number on the packet — is the evidence that the program is working.
  • Protectors provided at no cost, with a real choice. Employees must be able to select from a variety of suitable protectors, and be trained in fitting, care and use. Attenuation has to be adequate for the actual exposure.
  • Training annually, and records kept. Exposure measurements and audiometric records are retained; training is repeated every year.

Two limits apply regardless of the model. Hearing protection sits at the bottom of the hierarchy of controls — where feasible engineering or administrative controls can bring exposure down, they are required, and a plug is not a substitute for them. And a rating is a laboratory ceiling reached only with a correct fit, which is why fit and training move the outcome more than a higher number on the box.

Why trust WC Safety

WC Safety is an independent, affiliate-supported review site. We hold no inventory, sell nothing directly, and earn only from qualifying purchases made through clearly marked links — which never changes what a hearing protector is rated to do. This review is compiled by Steven Eaton from the manufacturer’s published listing, the EPA-labeled Noise Reduction Rating that appears on the packaging, and the text of OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 and the NIOSH hearing-loss prevention criteria. We hold no laboratory, run no attenuation testing, and publish no customer-rating aggregate, because we have no customers to aggregate. Where the published record disagrees with itself, we say so rather than pick a figure.

Our methodology

Specifications come from the live listing and its variant record; standards language comes from OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 and the NIOSH criteria directly. The NRR is reported as the manufacturer publishes it and then derated by a stated method — OSHA’s (NRR − 7) ÷ 2, or the NIOSH percentage for the device type — never presented as the protection a wearer receives. The score is an editorial judgment of specification, fit type and value: not a measured result, not an attenuation test, and not an average of user ratings.

Related hearing protection

Foam and reusable plugs sit under corded ear plugs, within the wider hearing protection range. Where plugs cannot be worn — ear infections, frequent on-off cycles, or a workforce that will not insert them consistently — ear muffs are the more reliable choice because their fit is far less technique-dependent. For intermittent noise where hearing speech between exposures matters, see banded ear plugs.

Researched and written by Steven Eaton, editor of WC Safety. Steven holds no safety certification and does not test products; this page compares what manufacturers publish, with the gaps in that record marked. Last reviewed July 2026.

Previous article San Jamar Classic Twin 9" Jumbo Tissue Dispenser Review

Leave a comment

* Required fields