Uvex S39610C Stealth Safety Goggles Clear Uvextreme Anti Fog Review
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, WC Safety earns from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Commissions do not influence our review.
★★★★½ 4.5/5
Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety Editorial
| Brand | Uvex |
|---|---|
| Category | Safety Goggles |
| Model / SKU | S39610C |
The Uvex S39610C Stealth Safety Goggles, Clear Anti-Fog is a safety goggles from Uvex, listed on Amazon. This review restates what the product page documents, places it in its eye and face protection lane, and points to the ranked guides for the head-to-head field.
What the Product Page Documents
Published · Last updated
Editorial assessment by Steven Eaton, WC Safety editor, based on published Uvex specifications and category fit. We did not laboratory-test this product.
As an Amazon Associate, WC Safety earns from qualifying purchases. Full affiliate disclosure .
The Uvex S39610C Stealth Safety Goggles deliver sealed, indirect-vent eye protection for industrial, laboratory, and jobsite environments where open-frame safety glasses leave gaps. Unlike spectacles, this is a sealed goggle : the soft body conforms to the face and creates a continuous barrier that helps block liquid splash, airborne dust, and flying particles from reaching the eyes.
Where It Earns Its Slot
Where it earns its slot: Editorial assessment by Steven Eaton, WC Safety editor, based on published Uvex specifications and category fit. We did not laboratory-test this product.. The sections below test that positioning against the documented configuration, not against wishful thinking.
Honest Limits
The limits track the marking: Z87 impact protection is not chemical-splash coverage, splash protection is not radiation filtering, and no lens protects once scratches or fog take the optics. Match the marking to the hazard assessment and replace lenses that have earned their retirement.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Documented safety goggles from Uvex
- Model S39610C — traceable part number
- Listing-grounded specs — nothing invented here
Cons
- Configuration options live on the linked listing
- Where the listing is silent on a rating, verify the physical markings
Alternatives in the Same Lane
- NoCry SG-6X3 OTG Safety Goggles — Over-Glasses Eye Protectio
- Super More Safety Goggles, Clear Anti-Fog Indirect-Vent Seal
- OXG B0BGRPV7DJ Safety Goggles — Clear Anti-Fog 6-Pack
- EinKau Lab Safety Goggles, Chemical Splash Protection
- Sellstrom S80225 Odyssey II Safety Goggles — Clear Lens
- Sellstrom S80226 Odyssey II Safety Goggles — Smoke Lens
- COOLJOB OTG Safety Goggles (B0F23TFDMV) — Over-Glasses Seale
- Uvex B016IHFAWQ Stealth Safety Goggles — Clear HydroShield
- Honeywell B085SRNKMQ Uvex Stealth OTG Safety Goggles — Clear
Eye And Face Protection Guides
- When Do You Need Safety Glasses?
- Best Safety Glasses for Construction Workers
- Can Safety Glasses Be Used for Welding?
- Best Face Shields for Welding & Grinding
- Construction Site PPE Guide
Browse by Category
- Safety Glasses
- Safety Goggles
- Face Shields
- Bifocal Safety Glasses
- Welding Goggles
- PPE Care & Accessories
Frequently Asked Questions
General questions about ratings, OSHA limits and fit are answered in the When Do You Need Safety Glasses? guide.
How much does the Uvex S39610C Stealth Safety Goggles, Clear Anti-Fog cost?
current pricing at the linked listing — prices track the live page, and configuration choices there can shift the number.
The Bottom Line
Rated 4.5/5 on documented spec, configuration, and value. The Uvex S39610C Stealth Safety Goggles, Clear Anti-Fog does the job its listing describes — the guides above tell you whether it's the right pick against the field.
About the Author
Steven Eaton is the founder of WC Safety and an industrial PPE specialist who sources and evaluates eye and face protection equipment for industrial and construction buyers.
How We Review
Eye-protection reviews restate ANSI Z87.1 markings exactly as listed — Z87+ impact, D3/D4 splash/dust, U-scale UV — and never assign markings a listing doesn't claim. Lens choice guidance follows the stated tint and coating only. Ratings reflect documented spec, configuration, and value — the basis is stated, not invented testing.
Affiliate Disclosure
WC Safety is an Amazon Associate and earns commissions on qualifying purchases through links on this page. Affiliate relationships do not influence our ratings.
Editorial Standards
Claims are drawn from listing data and published standards. WC Safety does not invent specifications or test results. Report errors to safetynw2012@gmail.com.
Common questions
What does the Uvex S39610C Stealth Safety Goggles, Clear Anti-Fog listing actually document?
Editorial assessment by Steven Eaton, WC Safety editor, based on published Uvex specifications and category fit. We did not laboratory-test this product.…
What are the alternatives to the Uvex S39610C Stealth Safety Goggles, Clear Anti-Fog?
The sibling safety goggles options linked in this review, ranked head-to-head in the eye and face protection guides below — start with the buyer's guides for the field view.
Sources. Requirements referenced here come from OSHA 29 CFR 1910 and the NIOSH recommendations. Where a consensus standard governs, the ANSI document is named in the text.
Related reference
Closely related on this site: 3m solus 1000 series safety glasses, 3m solus 2000 series safety glasses, 3m virua ap safety glasses, 3m virua ccs safety glasses, anti-fog safety glasses guide, and anti-fog vs anti-scratch safety glasses.
Why trust WC Safety
WC Safety is an independent, affiliate-supported review site. It is not a retailer: it holds no inventory, takes no orders, and earns only from qualifying purchases through clearly marked links — which never changes what a product is rated to do. Standards language is taken from the regulation text directly, and ratings are reported as the manufacturer publishes them. We run no laboratory and perform no testing of our own. Where published sources disagree, we say so and plan on the conservative figure rather than the flattering one.
Our methodology
Figures come from the regulation and the published specification, in that order. Derated numbers are calculated, not estimated. Nothing here is presented as a measured result, because we measure nothing.
Researched and written by Steven Eaton, editor of WC Safety. Steven holds no safety certification and does not test products; this page compares what manufacturers and regulators publish, with the gaps in that record marked. Last reviewed August 2026.
Leave a comment