Skip to content
Industrial Safety Equipment, PPE Guides & Reviews
Industrial Safety Equipment, PPE Guides & Reviews

Lincoln Electric Viking 1840 vs. Viking 1740: What's the Difference? (2026)

lincoln electric viking 1840 vs. viking 1740: the short answer

Short answer: The Lincoln Electric Viking 1840 and Viking 1740 share the same 4C lens technology and 1/1/1/1 EN 379 optical clarity rating β€” the highest achievable. Both carry ANSI Z87.1 certification; the 1840 uses four arc sensors and the 1740 two. The 1840 adds two features over the 1740: a lower shade floor (7–13 vs. 9–13) and a 5-year warranty. If you don't need the extended low end, the 1740 delivers identical optics at lower cost.

Affiliate Disclosure: WC Safety earns a commission on qualifying Amazon purchases. All recommendations are editorial.

The Lincoln Electric Viking 1840 and Viking 1740 share the same 4C lens technology and 1/1/1/1 EN 379 optical clarity rating β€” the highest achievable. Both carry ANSI Z87.1 certification; the 1840 uses four arc sensors and the 1740 two. The 1840 adds two features over the 1740: a lower shade floor (7–13 vs. 9–13) and a 5-year warranty. If you don't need the extended low end, the 1740 delivers identical optics at lower cost.

Quick Verdict

The Viking 1840 for multi-process work and plasma cutting. The Viking 1740 for TIG and MIG welders who don’t need the shade-7 low end.

Optical quality is identical β€” 1/1/1/1 EN 379 on both. The 1840 costs more because of its lower shade floor (7–13 vs. 9–13), two extra arc sensors, and the extended warranty. If those three features don't apply to your welding, the 1740 gives you the same puddle clarity for less.

Side-by-Side Specs

Published Β· Last updated

Spec Viking 1840 Viking 1740
Shade range 7–13 9–13
Arc sensors 4 4
Optical clarity 1/1/1/1 EN 379 (4C lens) 1/1/1/1 EN 379 (4C lens)
Grind mode Yes Yes
Plasma cutting Yes (7–13 covers the 8–10 minimums) 300A+ only (9–13 misses the shade-8 minimum required below 300A)
Warranty 5 years Standard Lincoln warranty
Weight Standard Standard

What They Share: Identical Optics

The defining feature of both Viking helmets is the 4C lens with 1/1/1/1 EN 379 optical clarity β€” the highest rated optics in the Lincoln lineup and among the clearest in the WC Safety welding helmet collection. Four arc sensors provide reliable arc detection in all positions including overhead, out-of-position, and confined spaces. Solar plus battery power, ANSI Z87.1 certification, and Lincoln's build quality apply equally to both.

Shade Range: 7–13 vs. 9–13

The Viking 1840 covers shade 7–13; the Viking 1740 covers shade 9–13. The difference matters only for plasma cutting β€” plasma cutting below 300A carries an OSHA minimum of shade 8 (1910.133(a)(5)). For all arc welding processes (MIG, TIG, stick, FCAW), both helmets cover the required shade range. If you do not own a plasma cutter and don't plan to, the shade range difference is irrelevant to your purchase decision.

Grind Mode and Warranty

The Viking 1840 adds grind mode (switches the lens to light state for grinding without removing the helmet) and a 5-year warranty. The Viking 1740 has neither. For fabricators who alternate between welding and grinding between passes, grind mode is a meaningful workflow feature. For welders who remove the helmet when grinding β€” a common habit in training programs β€” grind mode is irrelevant.

Buy the Viking 1840 if:

  • You plasma cut below 300A β€” OSHA requires shade 8 there, inside the 1840’s 7–13 range but below the 1740’s floor
  • You alternate between welding and grinding and want grind mode
  • You want the 5-year Lincoln warranty
  • You weld all processes including plasma cutting in one helmet

Buy the Viking 1740 if:

  • You TIG or MIG weld only β€” no plasma cutting
  • You want the same 1/1/1/1 EN 379 optics at lower cost
  • Grind mode is not part of your workflow
  • You're a professional entering the trades who doesn't yet have a plasma cutter

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between the Lincoln Viking 1840 and 1740?

Three differences: (1) The 1840 covers shade 7–13; the 1740 covers 9–13 β€” the 1840 covers plasma-arc cutting below 300A (shade 8 minimum), which the 1740 does not. (2) The 1840 uses four arc sensors; the 1740 two. (3) The 1840 carries a 5-year warranty vs. the 1740's standard warranty. Both have identical 1/1/1/1 EN 379 (4C) optics; the 1840 uses four arc sensors, the 1740 two.

Is the Viking 1840 worth the extra cost over the 1740?

Only if you need what it adds: plasma cutting range, grind mode, or the extended warranty. If none of those apply to your welding, the 1740 delivers the same optical quality and sensor performance for less money. The optics β€” which are the primary reason to buy either Viking β€” are identical.

Can the Viking 1740 be used for TIG welding?

Yes. The Viking 1740 has 1/1/1/1 EN 379 optics and two arc sensors, making it a capable TIG helmet. The shade 9–13 range covers TIG at 15–300A. See the best welding helmets for TIG welding guide β€” both Viking models appear in the top picks.

Does the Viking 1740 have grind mode?

Yes β€” the current Viking 1740 (K3282 series) includes a grind mode with an LED safety indicator, per Lincoln’s published specs. The shade ranges still differ: 9–13 on the 1740 vs. 7–13 on the 1840, and the 1740 does include a DIN 3 grind mode per Lincoln. The 1740 does not include grind mode.

Which is better for MIG welding?

Both perform identically for MIG β€” same optics, same sensors, same shade range for MIG amperages. The 1840 adds grind mode which is useful in fabrication shops where grinding between passes is routine. For pure MIG without grinding, the 1740 is the more cost-effective choice.

What is the difference between the Viking 1840 and Viking 2450?

The Viking 2450 matches the 1840’s optics (1/1/1/1 EN 379) and four sensors, runs a wider 5–13 shade range (the 1840 runs 7–13), and adds a larger extended-shell viewing area β€” designed for pipe welding and confined-space work. The 2450 is heavier. See the Viking 1840 vs. Viking 2450 comparison.

Is the Viking 1840 or 1740 better for beginners?

Neither is a beginner helmet by price or features β€” both are professional-tier. For beginners, see the best welding helmets for beginners. For a first professional helmet as skills develop, the Viking 1740 is the more practical entry point into the Viking lineup.

Do both Viking helmets work with all welding processes?

Both cover MIG, TIG, stick (SMAW), and FCAW β€” all standard arc welding processes. The Viking 1840 additionally covers plasma cutting below 300A β€” its 7–13 range includes the shade-8 minimum, while the 1740’s floor is 9. Neither is rated for oxy-acetylene welding (which uses shade 4–6 and requires welding goggles, not an ADF helmet).

Which Viking helmet has the best warranty?

The Viking 1840 carries a 5-year warranty β€” the longest in the Lincoln welding helmet lineup and one of the longest available in the market. The Viking 1740 has Lincoln's standard warranty terms.

Where can I compare all Lincoln Viking welding helmets?

See the best auto-darkening welding helmets guide for a full comparison across the welding helmets in the WC Safety lineup, or the complete welding helmet guide for process and selection guidance.

Written By

Steven Eaton

Safety Products Specialist, WC Safety Editorial. Independent, specification-based product research.

Reviewed By

WC Safety Editorial

Standards

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 Β· ANSI Z49.1:2021 Β· EN 379 Β· OSHA 29 CFR 1910.252

Affiliate Disclosure

WC Safety is an Amazon Associate. Commissions on qualifying purchases.

Primary sources for this page

The wording behind this page sits in OSHA 29 CFR 1910.133, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.252, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.133.

Why trust this page?

Why trust this page? Every figure on it is taken from the published text of the standard or the manufacturer document named beside it, not from a secondary summary. WC Safety is an independent PPE review site: we hold no inventory and sell nothing directly, so there is no product we need this page to favour. Where sources disagree, the page says so and plans on the more conservative figure rather than picking one.

Methodology: how this page is maintained

Methodology. Figures are read from the primary source and re-checked whenever the underlying standard or a manufacturer document changes. No laboratory testing is performed for this page. Where a figure is not published, the page states that rather than estimating it, because a plausible invented number is more dangerous than an absent one.

Previous article WypAll X50 vs X70 vs X80: The Wiper Ladder Explained (2026)

Leave a comment

* Required fields