Urinal Screens Deodorizer 48 Pack Review
Affiliate disclosure: WC Safety earns a commission on qualifying Amazon purchases at no extra cost to you.
The fleet case: 48 screens at 83 cents each — a year of monthly changes for four fixtures, or a quarter for sixteen, in one order. Screen programs live or die on the change schedule, and case stock is what keeps the schedule honest.
Editorial rating: 4.4/5. The standing-order SKU for real facilities; pair it with a written change schedule and the odor complaints stop.
Urinal Screens with Deodorizer (48-Pack) — current price and availability on Amazon:
Check Price on Amazon →Key specs
Published · Last updated
| Count | 48 screens |
| Design | 3D anti-splash per listing |
| Cost | ~83¢ per screen |
| Fit | Standard urinals |
Amazon listing verified (2026-07-16) — the button shows the live price.
Who it's for
Multi-restroom facilities, property managers running standing restroom-detail schedules, and anyone tired of ordering screens monthly.
Skip it if
Single-restroom operations where 48 screens is four years of stock — scent compounds fade in storage; buy the 10-pack.
How it fits the facility safety program
Restroom provision sits inside OSHA's sanitation expectations (1910.141), and service rounds are exposure-adjacent work under the bloodborne rule — gloved, zone-disciplined, properly disposed. Refill formats lock to dispensers exactly like towel systems. New to the department? Start at the janitorial & facility safety collection overview.
How it compares
vs 10-pack: the trial quantity. (Our take: full 10-pack review.)
vs Scott 04460 tissue: the rest of the restroom consumable order. (Our take: full Scott 04460 tissue review.)
Pros and cons
Pros
- 83¢/screen case economics
- 3D anti-splash design per listing
- One order covers the year
Cons
- Storage-life limits for tiny facilities
- Import listing documentation
- Same glove discipline per change
Build out the facility program
One product is a purchase; the program is what protects people. The chemistry rules live in the cleaning chemical safety guide and the wet-process discipline in the floor stripping guide; the whole hazard-to-product map is the custodial worker safety hub. Wave 1's decision tools carry the paper and waste programs: the dispenser compatibility guide, the liner size calculator, and the mil & micron decode, plus ranked picks for paper towels, liners, and wet floor signs. Crews need nitrile gloves, chemical-resistant gloves, splash goggles, and slip-resistant footwear; liquid failures belong to spill control. Shop the department: janitorial & facility safety, chemicals & dilution, equipment & floor machines, restroom supplies, shop towels & wipers — case-lot orders via bulk & business orders.
Bottom line: if the Urinal Screens with Deodorizer (48-Pack) fits your facility program, check the live listing:
Check Price on Amazon →Related janitorial reviews
- Urinal Screens with Deodorizer (10-Pack) review
- GOJO Premium Lotion Soap 800 mL Refills (Case of 12, 9106-12) review
- GOJO Rich Pink Antibacterial Soap 2000 mL TDX (4-Pack, 7220-04) review
- Zep Antimicrobial Hand Soap R46124 (1 Gal) review
- Simple Green Pro HD Concentrate (1 Gal) review
- Simple Green D Pro 3 Plus Disinfectant (1 Gal) review
- Zep Neutral pH Floor Cleaner ZUNEUT128 (1 Gal) review
Janitorial & facility supply FAQ
General questions about ratings, OSHA limits and fit are answered in the cleaning chemical safety guide guide.
How we review
WC Safety reviews are spec-honest: we work from the manufacturer's published data and the live Amazon listing, flag any claim that exists only in listing copy ("per the listing"), and never invent certifications or test results. Ratings are editorial judgments about fit-for-duty at the captured price — not aggregated user scores.
Sources
Manufacturer product pages and the Amazon listing linked above; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.22 (walking-working surfaces), 1910.141 (sanitation), 1910.1200 (hazard communication), 1910.1030 (bloodborne pathogens) as referenced; our dispenser-refill pairing documentation in the compatibility guide.
Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety — workplace PPE review site and Amazon Associate. Pricing captured 2026-07-16; click through for current pricing.
Common questions
Sealed soap refills or open gallons?
Sealed bag-in-box/cartridges (GOJO 800, TDX) eliminate open-reservoir contamination — the high-traffic answer. Gallon refills cost less per liter and suit controlled environments with disciplined refill routines.
Do soap refills lock to dispensers like towel rolls?
Identically: 800-series bags fit 800-series walls, TDX cartridges fit TDX push units, gallons fit whatever you pour them into. Check the wall before the case — the towel compatibility guide's logic, wall for wall.
How often do urinal screens change?
Monthly on the standard 30-day scent cycle; high-traffic facilities run 2-3 weeks. A written schedule plus case stock is the whole program — screens age out silently otherwise.
Is antibacterial soap required?
Rarely by regulation — technique and coverage matter more — but many facility and food-adjacent specs name it, which is what the antimicrobial lines (per their listings) exist to satisfy.
What's the bloodborne angle in restroom service?
Restroom rounds are exposure-adjacent work under 1910.1030: disposable nitrile as the floor, changed between zones, with proper disposal. Glove stock is a restroom supply, not just a PPE line.
Sources. Requirements referenced here come from OSHA 29 CFR 1910 and the NIOSH recommendations. Where a consensus standard governs, the ANSI document is named in the text.
Related reference
Related reading in this area: custodial worker safety guide, jumbo roll vs standard toilet paper: which tissue program?, facility safety checklist: a quarterly walkthrough for facility managers, how often should you strip and wax commercial floors? the real schedule, and janitorial safety checklist: daily, weekly and monthly custodial checks.
Why trust WC Safety
WC Safety is an independent, affiliate-supported review site. It is not a retailer: it holds no inventory, takes no orders, and earns only from qualifying purchases through clearly marked links — which never changes what a product is rated to do. Standards language is taken from the regulation text directly, and ratings are reported as the manufacturer publishes them. We run no laboratory and perform no testing of our own. Where published sources disagree, we say so and plan on the conservative figure rather than the flattering one.
Our methodology
Figures come from the regulation and the published specification, in that order. Derated numbers are calculated, not estimated. Nothing here is presented as a measured result, because we measure nothing.
Researched and written by Steven Eaton, editor of WC Safety. Steven holds no safety certification and does not test products; this page compares what manufacturers and regulators publish, with the gaps in that record marked. Last reviewed August 2026.
Leave a comment