Skip to content
Industrial Safety Equipment, PPE Guides & Reviews
Industrial Safety Equipment, PPE Guides & Reviews
Lincoln Electric K3118-2 Cutting & Grinding Goggles — Shade 3, Wide product photo

Lincoln Electric K3118 2 Cutting Grinding Goggles Shade 3 Review

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, WC Safety earns from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Commissions do not influence our review.

★★★★½ 4.6/5

Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety Editorial

Lincoln Electric K3118-2 Cutting & Grinding Goggles — Shade 3, Narrow — Key Details
Brand Lincoln Electric
Category Safety Goggle
Model / SKU K3118-2

The Lincoln Electric K3118-2 Cutting & Grinding Goggles — Shade 3, Narrow is a safety goggle from Lincoln Electric, listed on Amazon. This review restates what the product page documents, places it in its eye and face protection lane, and points to the ranked guides for the head-to-head field.

What the Product Page Documents

Published · Last updated

Best For: Light cutting, brazing, and torch soldering — and grinding — where a full Shade 5 is darker than the job needs and would cause eye strain. The lighter Shade 3 keeps the work visible while still blocking IR/UV.

Not For: Heavy oxy-fuel or plasma cutting (use Shade 5), or any arc welding (use an auto-darkening helmet).

Bottom Line: The Shade 3 companion to Lincoln’s wide cutting goggle — the right density for lighter torch work. For heavier cutting, step up to the Lincoln K3118-1 (Shade 5) .

Where It Earns Its Slot

The honest positioning: Light cutting, brazing, and torch soldering — and grinding — where a full Shade 5 is darker than the job needs and would cause eye strain. The lighter Shade 3 keeps the work visible while still blocking IR/UV. Rather than restating the listing, this review weighs that intended use against the documented configuration and the alternatives ranked in the linked guides. Our editorial score of 4.6/5 reflects that fit.

Honest Limits

The limits track the marking: Z87 impact protection is not chemical-splash coverage, splash protection is not radiation filtering, and no lens protects once scratches or fog take the optics. Match the marking to the hazard assessment and replace lenses that have earned their retirement.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Documented safety goggle from Lincoln Electric
  • Model K3118-2 — traceable part number
  • Listing-grounded specs — nothing invented here

Cons

  • Configuration options live on the linked listing
  • Where the listing is silent on a rating, verify the physical markings

Alternatives in the Same Lane

Eye And Face Protection Guides

Browse by Category

Frequently Asked Questions

General questions about ratings, OSHA limits and fit are answered in the When Do You Need Safety Glasses? guide.

How much does the Lincoln Electric K3118-2 Cutting & Grinding Goggles — Shade 3 cost?

current pricing at the linked listing — prices track the live page, and configuration choices there can shift the number.

The Bottom Line

Rated 4.6/5 on documented spec, configuration, and value. The Lincoln Electric K3118-2 Cutting & Grinding Goggles — Shade 3, Narrow does the job its listing describes — the guides above tell you whether it's the right pick against the field.


About the Author

Steven Eaton is the founder of WC Safety and an industrial PPE specialist who sources and evaluates eye and face protection equipment for industrial and construction buyers.

How We Review

Eye-protection reviews restate ANSI Z87.1 markings exactly as listed — Z87+ impact, D3/D4 splash/dust, U-scale UV — and never assign markings a listing doesn't claim. Lens choice guidance follows the stated tint and coating only. Ratings reflect documented spec, configuration, and value — the basis is stated, not invented testing.

Affiliate Disclosure

WC Safety is an Amazon Associate and earns commissions on qualifying purchases through links on this page. Affiliate relationships do not influence our ratings.

Editorial Standards

Claims are drawn from listing data and published standards. WC Safety does not invent specifications or test results. Report errors to safetynw2012@gmail.com.

Common questions

What does the Lincoln Electric K3118-2 Cutting & Grinding Goggles — Shade listing actually document?

Best For: Light cutting, brazing, and torch soldering — and grinding — where a full Shade 5 is darker than the job needs and would cause eye strain. The lighter Shade 3 keeps the work visible while still blocking IR/UV.…

What are the alternatives to the Lincoln Electric K3118-2 Cutting & Grinding Goggles — Shade ?

The sibling safety goggle options linked in this review, ranked head-to-head in the eye and face protection guides below — start with the buyer's guides for the field view.

Is the shade number on the lens a minimum or a recommendation?

The values in OSHA's filter-lens table at 1910.133(a)(5) are mandatory minimums in covered workplaces. The suggested shades above them are comfort guidance - never go lighter than the minimum for your process and amperage.

Is a darker shade than the minimum safer?

It is compliant - the minimum is a floor, not a target - but an over-dark lens hides the weld puddle and causes its own errors. Start at the suggested shade and never drop below the minimum.

Sources. Requirements referenced here come from OSHA 29 CFR 1910 and the NIOSH recommendations. Where a consensus standard governs, the ANSI document is named in the text.

Related reference

Related reading in this area: 3m infrared flip-up shade 3 review: gas work, fit-over & limits, auto darkening vs passive welding helmet, and best face shields for welding, grinding, and cutting.

Why trust WC Safety

WC Safety is an independent, affiliate-supported review site. It is not a retailer: it holds no inventory, takes no orders, and earns only from qualifying purchases through clearly marked links — which never changes what a product is rated to do. Standards language is taken from the regulation text directly, and ratings are reported as the manufacturer publishes them. We run no laboratory and perform no testing of our own. Where published sources disagree, we say so and plan on the conservative figure rather than the flattering one.

Our methodology

Figures come from the regulation and the published specification, in that order. Derated numbers are calculated, not estimated. Nothing here is presented as a measured result, because we measure nothing.

Researched and written by Steven Eaton, editor of WC Safety. Steven holds no safety certification and does not test products; this page compares what manufacturers and regulators publish, with the gaps in that record marked. Last reviewed August 2026.

Previous article Toptes Pt520A Review

Leave a comment

* Required fields