Skip to content
Industrial Safety Equipment & PPE — ANSI/OSHA Compliant
Industrial Safety Equipment & PPE — ANSI/OSHA Compliant

Ansell Microflex 93-260 Review (2026)

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, WC Safety earns from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. We stock this product; commissions do not influence our review.

★★★★½ 4.5/5

Reviewed by Steven Eaton, WC Safety Editorial

Ansell Microflex 93-260 — Key Specifications
Brand Ansell
Category Disposable Chemical-Splash Glove
Construction (per listing) Disposable; nitrile and neoprene layers; multi-chemical resistance claims
Typical price $27.99
Model 93-260

The Ansell Microflex 93-260 is a disposable chemical-splash glove from Ansell, stocked at $27.99 — built as a nitrile/neoprene dual-layer film in an exam-weight disposable. It's the pick for lab and maintenance work that alternates chemistries all day and needs fingertip dexterity with each. This review covers what the listing documents, where it beats its closest rival, and who should buy something else.

Why the Ansell Microflex 93-260 Stands Out

The 93-260 does something genuinely unusual: real multi-chemical resistance in a glove thin enough for instrument work. Layering neoprene with nitrile widens the chemical chart beyond what either film covers alone — which is why it shows up in labs and maintenance shops as 'the disposable that handles the weird stuff.' It costs like a premium disposable because it is one.

Specification and Configuration

What the listing commits to: disposable; nitrile and neoprene layers; multi-chemical resistance claims. Claims beyond that — lab numbers, endurance figures, certifications the listing doesn't state — don't appear in this review, because we don't invent them. Size and color options run on the linked Amazon listing rather than as separate stocked variants.

Chemical gloves are selected by polymer against the specific chemical — nitrile for oils and many solvents, butyl for ketones and polar solvents, neoprene for acids and caustics, PVC for rough wet service — and the deciding document is the manufacturer's permeation chart, not the word 'resistant' on a listing. The Ansell Microflex 93-260 is the disposable chemical-splash glove entry in that matrix; the full polymer-sorted lineup lives in our Chemical-Resistant Gloves collection.

Where It Falls Short

Its limits, honestly: Single-known-chemical splash duty at volume — the TouchNTuff 92-600 covers that cheaper per glove.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Disposable
  • $27.99 — positioned honestly against its ladder
  • From Ansell — the reference brand in jobsite cooling
  • Listing states its construction claims plainly

Cons

  • Single-listing size/color selection happens on Amazon, not as stocked variants
  • Single-known-chemical splash duty at volume

Who Should Buy It

Order the Ansell Microflex 93-260 if you are lab and maintenance work that alternates chemistries all day and needs fingertip dexterity with each.

Who Should Skip It

Skip it for single-known-chemical splash duty at volume — the TouchNTuff 92-600 covers that cheaper per glove.

How It Compares

The 92-600 for one known chemistry at volume; the 93-260 when the chemical list is long or changing. Neither replaces a reusable for immersion — they're both incidental-contact tools. The Chemical-Resistant Gloves collection carries the complete ladder so you can compare every tier. Head-to-head rival: Ansell TouchNTuff 92-600.

Other Options in the Lineup

Hand Protection Guides

Browse by Category

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Ansell Microflex 93-260 made of?

Per the listing: disposable; nitrile and neoprene layers; multi-chemical resistance claims. That's the documented construction — anything beyond it belongs to the manufacturer's spec sheet, not this review.

How much does the Ansell Microflex 93-260 cost?

$27.99 at the linked Amazon listing. Prices track the live listing, and size or color selections there can shift the number.

Ansell Microflex 93-260 vs Ansell TouchNTuff 92-600 — which should I buy?

The 92-600 for one known chemistry at volume; the 93-260 when the chemical list is long or changing. Neither replaces a reusable for immersion — they're both incidental-contact tools.

Who is the Ansell Microflex 93-260 best for?

Lab and maintenance work that alternates chemistries all day and needs fingertip dexterity with each.

When should I skip the Ansell Microflex 93-260?

Single-known-chemical splash duty at volume — the TouchNTuff 92-600 covers that cheaper per glove.

What sizes does the Ansell Microflex 93-260 come in?

The size run (and color options where offered) lives on the linked Amazon listing — we deliberately don't restate it, because listings update. Check the size chart there before ordering.

Is Ansell a good brand?

Ansell is the global reference in chemical hand protection — the AlphaTec/Solvex, TouchNTuff, and Microflex lines are what safety data sheets and industrial hygiene programs specify by part number. Its published permeation data is the backbone of chemical-specific glove selection, which is exactly what separates a chemical glove from a rubber glove.

What chemicals does the Ansell Microflex 93-260 protect against?

The ones its polymer handles per the manufacturer's permeation chart — 'chemical resistant' is never a blanket claim. Look up your specific chemical and required contact time in Ansell's chemical-resistance guide before relying on any glove; breakthrough times differ by orders of magnitude across chemistries.

What do permeation and breakthrough time mean for the Ansell Microflex 93-260?

Permeation is chemical movement through an intact glove at the molecular level; breakthrough time is how long that takes at test conditions. A glove that visibly survives a solvent can still be passing it through to your skin — which is why selection runs on published breakthrough data, not on whether the glove looks fine.

Can the Ansell Microflex 93-260 be reused, and how should it be decontaminated?

As a disposable, no — strip it off with the contamination inside and bin it; reuse defeats the entire format.

Does OSHA require chemical-resistant gloves like the Ansell Microflex 93-260?

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.138 requires employers to select hand protection appropriate to the hazard identified in their assessment — for chemical exposures that means a glove whose polymer and breakthrough data match the chemical and task duration. The HazCom SDS for each chemical names the protective-glove requirement the assessment must satisfy.

What thickness is the Ansell Microflex 93-260, and does mil rating matter?

Per the listing: disposable; nitrile and neoprene layers; multi-chemical resistance claims. Thickness buys durability and (usually) longer breakthrough, at the cost of dexterity — but polymer choice matters far more than mil count. A thin glove of the right polymer beats a thick glove of the wrong one every time.

Lined or unlined — which configuration of glove like the Ansell Microflex 93-260 should I buy?

Flock lining absorbs sweat and makes full-shift wear tolerable; unlined gloves decontaminate faster, shed no lint into the process, and dry quicker between cycles. Assign by task: lined for continuous dry-side handling, unlined for wash-down and lint-sensitive work.

When should I use a disposable instead of a reusable chemical glove (or vice versa)?

Disposables for incidental contact and splash — strip and bin with the contamination. Reusables for immersion, sustained contact, and abrasive handling, where a 5-mil film would fail mechanically long before the chemistry got through. The crossover mistake is using disposables for immersion; that's how breakthrough happens mid-task.

What other PPE pairs with the Ansell Microflex 93-260 for chemical work?

Splash protection scales with the task: chemical splash goggles over safety glasses, a face shield for pouring and transfer, and chemical-resistant aprons or coveralls for anything that can wet clothing. The glove is one layer of the chemical PPE assessment, not the whole answer.

The Bottom Line

The Ansell Microflex 93-260 does its job at its price: a nitrile/neoprene dual-layer film in an exam-weight disposable at $27.99. Rated 4.5/5 on documented spec, configuration, and value for the intended buyer.


About the Author

Steven Eaton is the founder of WC Safety and an industrial PPE specialist who sources and evaluates chemical hand protection for industrial and construction buyers.

How We Review

Reviews draw on the manufacturer's published listing data and the applicable OSHA and ANSI consensus standards. We do not run lab tests or invent specifications; where a listing states no rating, the review says so. Ratings reflect documented spec, configuration, and value.

Affiliate Disclosure

WC Safety is an Amazon Associate and earns commissions on qualifying purchases through links on this page. Affiliate relationships do not influence our ratings.

Editorial Standards

Claims are drawn from listing data and published standards. WC Safety does not invent specifications or test results. Report errors to safetynw2012@gmail.com.

Previous article MCR Safety CP7 Review (2026)

Leave a comment

* Required fields